2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2014.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cascade force control for autonomous beating heart motion compensation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Much work has been done investigating components or approaches to such a system. Research groups have developed vision algorithms for tissue tracking and heart motion modelling [8]- [10], compensation devices in the form of epicardial crawling robots [11], active mechanical tissue stabilizers [12], custom heart motion cancellation systems [13]- [15], specific control paradigms for heart motion compensation systems [16]- [18], and custom 3D heart simulators [18]. These studies have made significant progress on heartbeat synchronization for ECABG, but none present a clinically feasible solutions for a robotic system to perform 3D heart motion compensation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much work has been done investigating components or approaches to such a system. Research groups have developed vision algorithms for tissue tracking and heart motion modelling [8]- [10], compensation devices in the form of epicardial crawling robots [11], active mechanical tissue stabilizers [12], custom heart motion cancellation systems [13]- [15], specific control paradigms for heart motion compensation systems [16]- [18], and custom 3D heart simulators [18]. These studies have made significant progress on heartbeat synchronization for ECABG, but none present a clinically feasible solutions for a robotic system to perform 3D heart motion compensation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To cope with non‐linearities, disturbances, integral wind‐up and other complex issues in process systems, a number of cascade control strategies have been developed to improve either the outer loop performance or the inner loop performance or both. Examples such as the linear quadratic (LQ) self‐tuning controller [20], neuro‐fuzzy generalised predictive controller [1], model predictive controllers [2, 6, 7, 19] and neural network (NN)‐based controllers [3, 18] were reported for the outer loop primary controller design. Control algorithms have also been developed for the design of the secondary controller in the inner loop, for example, model‐reference adaptive control based on Kalman active observer [19], predictive control [6, 7] and sliding mode control [9], to name a few.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples such as the LQ self-tuning controller [20], neuro-fuzzy generalized predictive controller [1], model predictive controllers [2; 6; 7; 19] and neural network (NN) based controllers [3; 18] were reported for the outer loop primary controller design. Control algorithms have also been developed for the design of the secondary controller in the inner loop, for example, model-reference adaptive control based on Kalman active 2 observer [19], predictive control [6; 7] and sliding mode control [9], to name a few. In addition, there are methods developed to improve both the primary and the secondary controllers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation