T he entry of free herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) into susceptible cells requires the coordinated activities of 4 viral envelope glycoproteins (1-4). After virion adsorption to cell surface heparan sulfates, mediated mainly by a fifth envelope glycoprotein, glycoprotein C (gC) (5, 6), gD binds to one of its specific receptors, herpesvirus entry mediator (HVEM or HveA), nectin-1 (HveC), or 3-O-sulfated heparan sulfate (7-9). Receptor binding results in a conformational change in gD, which in turn activates the fusion mechanism mediated by gB and the gH/gL heterodimer; fusion merges the viral envelope with the cell surface or endosomal membrane, resulting in capsid release into the cytoplasm (10-15).HSV entry by direct cell-to-cell (lateral) spread involves a similar fusion step and requires the same 4 entry glycoproteins along with a receptor for gD (1-4, 16-18). However, evidence exists to indicate that the two entry processes are not mechanistically identical. For example, gD mutants that allow gD receptor-independent cell-to-cell spread, but not receptor-independent entry, have been isolated (19). Likewise, gD is required for entry of the related alphaherpesvirus pseudorabies virus (PRV) but not for PRV lateral spread (20-23). Two additional glycoproteins, gE and gI, are important for HSV-1 spread but are dispensable for entry of free virus (reviewed in reference 24). However, it is unknown whether the roles of gB and gH/gL are different in entry and spread.The crystal structure of the HSV-1 gB ectodomain shows unexpected homology to the postfusion form of glycoprotein G from vesicular stomatitis virus, a well-characterized fusion protein (25), suggesting direct participation of gB in the fusion reaction. Although previous studies reported that gH displays hallmarks of fusion proteins (26-29), the crystal structure of the HSV-2 gH ectodomain bound to gL bears no similarity to any known viral fusogen (30). Nonetheless, both gB and gH may possess fusogenic capabilities, as each alone can promote membrane fusion during nuclear egress (31). Previous evidence indicated that gH/gL could carry out hemifusion, an intermediate state in which the outer membrane leaflets of the target and viral membranes mix, whereas both gB and gH/gL were required for complete fusion (32), but these findings were recently called into question (33). Recent studies suggested that gH/gL activates the dormant fusogenic activity of gB in response to signaling by receptor-bound gD (30,34,35), indicating that gH/gL performs an intermediate regulatory function in the steps leading to membrane fusion. However, since these studies were performed in virus-free cell fusion systems, it is unclear whether they apply equally to virus entry and spread. Moreover, it remains uncertain whether gH/gL also has a role as cofusogen in either event.By taking advantage of the ability of HSV to adapt to constraints on receptor usage for entry, we previously identified gainof-function derivatives of a gD mutant virus that was impaired for its ability to use necti...