2012
DOI: 10.1117/12.910809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cascaded classifier for large-scale data applied to automatic segmentation of articular cartilage

Abstract: Many classification/segmentation tasks in medical imaging are particularly challenging for machine learning algorithms because of the huge amount of training data required to cover biological variability. Learning methods scaling badly in the number of training data points may not be applicable. This may exclude powerful classifiers with good generalization performance such as standard non-linear support vector machines (SVMs). Further, many medical imaging problems have highly imbalanced class populations, be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another conventional technique is to perform a cascaded learning approach. Prasoon et al [172,173] proposed an extended cascaded classification framework originally introduced by [50]. This extended framework is known as a hierarchical classification scheme to segment femoral and tibial cartilage.…”
Section: Semantic Context and Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another conventional technique is to perform a cascaded learning approach. Prasoon et al [172,173] proposed an extended cascaded classification framework originally introduced by [50]. This extended framework is known as a hierarchical classification scheme to segment femoral and tibial cartilage.…”
Section: Semantic Context and Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach is compared to the state-of-the-art method that is based on one stage of nearest neighbor classification. We discuss the similarities and differences in segmenting femoral and tibial cartilages as well as the challenges faced due to the even higher amount of training data compared to [2]. Furthermore, we consider images of subjects scanned twice within one week and investigate the inter-scan reproducibility of the proposed classifier in comparison to a radiologist and the current state-of-the-art method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…An example of such a classifier is a non-linear support vector machine (SVM, [1]), where the training time scales worse than quadratically with the number of training data points. In our previous work [2], we presented a two-stage cascaded classifier approach to overcome this restriction. The proposed classifier was applied to segment tibial cartilage in low-field knee MRI scans and outperformed the state-of-the-art method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%