2022
DOI: 10.1109/taes.2021.3103705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cascaded Least Square Algorithm for Strong Clutter Removal in Airborne Passive Radar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3: The equivalent radial velocity v T is calculated by (10). 4: The velocity in the current cell is calculated by using the specified value for the j group velocity and the (11). 5: The bistatic range is calculated according to the obtained range R T and velocity v T and (6).…”
Section: Requirementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3: The equivalent radial velocity v T is calculated by (10). 4: The velocity in the current cell is calculated by using the specified value for the j group velocity and the (11). 5: The bistatic range is calculated according to the obtained range R T and velocity v T and (6).…”
Section: Requirementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the radial velocity is measured to be 120 m/s. The target velocity is calculated to be (−38.2, −58.3, −71.3) m/s using Equation (11). 1.…”
Section: Simulation Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Airborne passive radars exploit the existing transmitters as emitters of opportunity, having attracted widespread attention in recent years [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. Compared with airborne active radars, the lack of dedicated transmitters offers the advantages of low cost, strong survivability, and antijamming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of this technique mainly depends on the estimated accuracy of CCM. According to the Reed-Mallet-Brennan (RMB) criterion [7], to achieve approximately optimal performance, the training samples used to estimate CCM should be independent and identically distributed (IID) with respect to CUT, and the number of IID training samples should be at least twice as many as the degrees of freedom (DOFs) [8,9]. This condition can be satisfied when the airborne radar is in a homogeneous clutter environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%