Cascaded model predictive speed control of a permanent magnet synchronous machine

Garcia, Cristian; Silva, César; Rodríguez, José; Zanchetta, Pericle

doi:10.1109/iecon.2016.7793151

Cited by 13 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The overall block diagram of the proposed SPC is shown in Figure 7. To design the SPC, the forward Euler method is applied to speed dynamic equation as in Equation (2) for discretization period T s as [26,28,37]…”

Section: The Proposed Speed Predictive Controlmentioning

confidence: 99%

Advanced Strategy of Speed Predictive Control for Nonlinear Synchronous Reluctance Motors

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To gain fast dynamic response, high performance, and good tracking capability, several control strategies have been applied to synchronous reluctance motors (SynRMs). In this paper, a nonlinear advanced strategy of speed predictive control (SPC) based on the finite control set model predictive control (FCS-MPC) is proposed and simulated for nonlinear SynRMs. The SPC overcomes the limitation of the cascaded control structure of the common vector control by employing a novel strategy that considers all the electrical and mechanical variables in one control law through a new cost function to obtain the switching signals for the power converter. The SynRM flux maps are known based on finite element method (FEM) analysis to take into consideration the effect of the nonlinearity of the machine. To clear the proposed strategy features, a functional and qualitative comparison between the proposed SPC, field-oriented control (FOC) with an anti-windup scheme, and current predictive control (CPC) with outer PI speed control loop is presented. For simplicity, particle swarm optimization (PSO) is performed to tune all the unknown parameters of the control strategies. The comparison features include controller design, dynamic and steady-state behaviors. Simulation results are presented to investigate the benefits and limitations of the three control strategies. Finally, the proposed SPC, FOC, and CPC have their own merits, and all methods encounter the requirements of advanced high-performance drives.

show abstract

Section: The Proposed Speed Predictive Controlmentioning

confidence: 99%

Advanced Strategy of Speed Predictive Control for Nonlinear Synchronous Reluctance Motors

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The PI controller is widely used in closed-loop speed control systems of motors, pumps, fans, and other mechanical systems in industrial applications. Regarding modifications in the speed reference and torque disturbance, the closed-loop speed control exhibits strong dynamic performance [3], [4]. In [5], the proposed PI control approach can produce a better response in terms of flux, torque, and speed control for different speed commands, load disturbances, and parameter uncertainties.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Design and Development of Cascaded Current Control in DC Motor Variable Speed Drive using dSPACE

Ahmad Firdaus,

Davendren,

Azmi

et al. 2023

J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Even today, DC motors are still used in variety of applications, including home appliances, transportation, as well as industrial crane and rolling machine. However, achieving precise speed and torque control in DC drives at industry level could be challenging, as instability and reduced efficiency remains at large. This project focuses on developing a cascaded control system for a Separately Excited Brushed DC motor using dSPACE platform. The cascaded control system, designed using MATLAB Simulink, incorporates a proportional-integral (PI) controller at the speed loop and a Hysteresis controller at the current loop to improve robustness and dynamic performance. The experimental setup utilizes the dSPACE 1104 platform, an asymmetric bridge converter board, gate driver, and electrical load. Speed measurement is done using an incremental encoder, while current is measured using the ACS712 current sensor. The drive system was tested in alternate low and high speed cycle on various load level to test for stability, robustness and dynamic performance. The proposed control system was compared with PI-closed-loop control and open-loop control determine the best drive performance. Experimental results showed significant improvement in term of transient response and ripple reduction of speed and current for proposed cascaded current control over the closed-loop design.

show abstract

A speed and current cascade Continuous Control Set Model Predictive Control architecture for synchronous motor drives

Carlet

Toso

Favato

et al. 2019

2019 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cascaded model predictive speed control of a permanent magnet synchronous machine

Cited by 13 publications

References 27 publications

Advanced Strategy of Speed Predictive Control for Nonlinear Synchronous Reluctance Motors

Advanced Strategy of Speed Predictive Control for Nonlinear Synchronous Reluctance Motors

Design and Development of Cascaded Current Control in DC Motor Variable Speed Drive using dSPACE

A speed and current cascade Continuous Control Set Model Predictive Control architecture for synchronous motor drives

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About