2009 IEEE International Advance Computing Conference 2009
DOI: 10.1109/iadcc.2009.4809226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cascading GA & CFS for Feature Subset selection in Medical Data Mining

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In second method, the authors have used GA and Correlation based feature selection (CFS) in a cascaded fashion, where GA rendered global search of attributes with fitness evaluation effected by CFS. Genetic algorithm is used as search method with Correlation based feature selection as subset evaluating mechanism [8]. GA-CFS resulted in following four relevant attributes: Intensity, Std.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In second method, the authors have used GA and Correlation based feature selection (CFS) in a cascaded fashion, where GA rendered global search of attributes with fitness evaluation effected by CFS. Genetic algorithm is used as search method with Correlation based feature selection as subset evaluating mechanism [8]. GA-CFS resulted in following four relevant attributes: Intensity, Std.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most appropriate algorithm for feature or attribute selection is a Genetic algorithm [1] [7], where initially all the attributes are considered as individual subsets and the final combination of the attributes or features are noted as optimal best feature subset. The framework is been proposed here:…”
Section: Proposed Framework For Pre-processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The focus of this work is to demonstrate a Novel Multilayer Perceptron Model to Detect Heart Disease Severity and motivated by the work of Asha Gowda et al [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hybrid K-means and Decision tree [10] achieved the classification accuracy of 92.38% using 10 fold cross validations, cascaded learning system based on Generalized Discriminate analysis (GDA) and Least Square Support Vector Machine (LS_SVM), showed accuracy of 82.05% for diagnosis of Pima dataset [11]. Further authors have achieved classification accuracy of % 72.88 using ANN, 78.21% using DT_ANN where decision tree C4.5 is used to identify relevant features and given as input to ANN [12], 79.50% using Cascaded GA_CFS_ANN, relevant feature identified by Genetic algorithm with Correlation based feature selection is given as input to ANN [13], 77.71% using GA optimized ANN, 84.10% using GA optimized ANN with relevant features identified by decision tree and 84.71% with GA optimized ANN with relevant features identified by GA_CFS [14 ].…”
Section: Clustering Algorithms For Classifying Pima Indian Diabetic Dmentioning
confidence: 99%