pathology departments at hospitals across Boston, Massachusetts received numerous amputated limbs, as well as other surgical specimens from trauma surgeries. In the absence of clear guidelines, each department faced uncertainties in performing gross examination of these specimens.Objective.-To develop a protocol for processing surgical specimens with forensic evidence.Design.-We collaborated with representatives who knew the practices at 3 major Boston hospitals, the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner of Massachusetts, and a senior team leader for the evidence response team for the Boston, Massachusetts division of the US Federal Bureau of Investigation to construct a protocol for processing specimens with forensic evidence.Results.-A simple and robust protocol approved by experts in forensic evidence collection was developed. Important points in this protocol include (1) assigning the task of processing the specimens to one individual or one team of individuals, (2) photographing all specimens before and after washing, (3) obtaining a radiograph of each specimen, and (4) identifying a secure area to store forensic evidence.Conclusions.-When acts of terror occur, protocols provide order and clarification to the processing of surgical specimens. We propose a protocol that provides guidance for pathology departments across the country to handle trauma-related surgical specimens with forensic evidence in an efficient manner to allow optimal patient care and a secure way of gathering forensic evidence.