2017
DOI: 10.1080/01626620.2017.1292160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Case-Based Instruction to Teach Educators about the Legal Parameters Surrounding the Discipline of Students with Disabilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Referring to the vignettes provided by the author to interviewees, P103 commented, "I think what's really valuable is like what you did, is putting out some scenarios and talking about as a group of principals, what would you do in this situation and I don't think we do enough of that actually". While not reflective of the workshops and seminars that these principals had attended, this case-based approach aligns with recommendations made in overseas legal literacy research (Decker & Pazey, 2017;Decker et al, 2019). These studies emphasise the need for training to not only impart legal knowledge but to teach principals how to apply the law through practice-based scenarios (Decker & Pazey, 2017;Schneider, 2021;Trimble, 2017).…”
Section: Professional Development For Principalsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Referring to the vignettes provided by the author to interviewees, P103 commented, "I think what's really valuable is like what you did, is putting out some scenarios and talking about as a group of principals, what would you do in this situation and I don't think we do enough of that actually". While not reflective of the workshops and seminars that these principals had attended, this case-based approach aligns with recommendations made in overseas legal literacy research (Decker & Pazey, 2017;Decker et al, 2019). These studies emphasise the need for training to not only impart legal knowledge but to teach principals how to apply the law through practice-based scenarios (Decker & Pazey, 2017;Schneider, 2021;Trimble, 2017).…”
Section: Professional Development For Principalsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…While not reflective of the workshops and seminars that these principals had attended, this case-based approach aligns with recommendations made in overseas legal literacy research (Decker & Pazey, 2017;Decker et al, 2019). These studies emphasise the need for training to not only impart legal knowledge but to teach principals how to apply the law through practice-based scenarios (Decker & Pazey, 2017;Schneider, 2021;Trimble, 2017).…”
Section: Professional Development For Principalsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Gilbert (2017) examined the benefits of a scenariobased training approach. More recently, Decker and Pazey (2017) and Schneider (2020) identified the value of delivering case-focused instruction that could embrace context and improve critical thinking.…”
Section: Instructional Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These core descriptors were affirmed over 25 years ago by Bull and McCarthy (1995), who used the terms legal product to describe legal knowledge or content and legal process to depict the application of that knowledge. These core elements have long been supported by contemporary scholarship (Decker, 2014;Decker & Brady, 2014;Decker & Pazey, 2017;Decker et al, 2019;Schneider, 2020;Taylor, 2001). Although there is more work to be done, in the two-part legal product and legal process description articulated by Bull and McCarthy (1995) represents the accepted unofficial definition of legal literacy.…”
Section: Legal Literacymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Second, there is some unknown number of students with disabilities that are unserved by IDEA that are probably experiencing exclusionary discipline at the same rate or even higher rate than students with disabilities served under IDEA. Furthermore, students with disabilities unserved by IDEA have been previously noted as a vulnerable population with respect to exclusionary discipline given that these students are not receiving services under IDEA (2004) (e.g., Crepeau-Hobson & Leech, 2022; Decker & Pazey, 2017; Mallett, 2017; Mallett et al, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%