2010
DOI: 10.1001/archoto.2010.57
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Case-Control Analysis of Cochlear Implant Performance in Elderly Patients

Abstract: Elderly patients benefit significantly from cochlear implantation. Compared with a younger cohort matched for preimplantation performance, however, their postimplantation scores are significantly lower on some measures. These results may provide guidelines for candidacy and counseling regarding elderly patients with cochlear implants.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
79
2
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
7
79
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As suggested in previously reported retrospective research, our multivariate analysis confirms that advanced age is associated with poorer speech perception scores, but only in very difficult noisy conditions, such as 0 dB SNR [Budenz et al, 2011;Carlson et al, 2010;Friedland et al, 2010;Gaylor et al, 2013;Lazard et al, 2012;Leung et al, 2005;Mahmoud and Ruckenstein, 2014;Roberts et al, 2013]. Shorter duration of hearing deprivation, residual hearing and preimplant hearing aid use in the future implanted ear positively influence cochlear implant outcomes in elderly patients and is supported by research in younger adult populations [Lazard et al, 2012;Holden et al, 2013].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As suggested in previously reported retrospective research, our multivariate analysis confirms that advanced age is associated with poorer speech perception scores, but only in very difficult noisy conditions, such as 0 dB SNR [Budenz et al, 2011;Carlson et al, 2010;Friedland et al, 2010;Gaylor et al, 2013;Lazard et al, 2012;Leung et al, 2005;Mahmoud and Ruckenstein, 2014;Roberts et al, 2013]. Shorter duration of hearing deprivation, residual hearing and preimplant hearing aid use in the future implanted ear positively influence cochlear implant outcomes in elderly patients and is supported by research in younger adult populations [Lazard et al, 2012;Holden et al, 2013].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The literature provides evidence that cochlear implantation in the elderly improves speech perception ability in quiet and noise and in the quality of life, even in patients aged 80 years and older, with a durable benefit over time [Budenz et al, 2011;Carlson et al, 2010;Clark et al, 2012;Cloutier et al, 2014;Dillon et al, 2013;Friedland et al, 2010;Lenarz et al, 2012;Leung et al, 2005;Mahmoud and Ruckenstein, 2014; Mosnier et al, in press;Olze et al, 2012;Roberts et al, 2013;Williamson et al, 2009]. Most of these retrospective studies compare speech perception scores between the elderly and a cohort of younger patients, and show that advanced age is correlated negatively with cochlear implant outcome, especially for tests in noise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fur- 228 thermore, the postoperative performance of older adults in this study is generally on par with previously published speech recognition scores of 70-77, 38-50, and 68%, for HINT, CNC-W, and CNC-P, respectively [Budenz et al, 2011;Friedland et al, 2010;Zwolan et al, 2014].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…However, there were no other significant differences, especially regarding age at implantation, duration of deafness, and preoperative speech perception, factors known to influence speech perception after cochlear implantation (18,19). Furthermore, the CI electrode used, the surgical approach, and the preoperative PTA showed no significant association with the postoperative word perception score after 18 or more months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%