2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2011.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Case–control and cross-sectional methods for estimating crash modification factors: Comparisons from roadway lighting and lane and shoulder width safety effect studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
23
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These methods showed that crash frequency was reduced with increasing shoulder width. Gross and Donnell [19] used two methods to determine crash modification factors (CMFs). Their study utilized case-control and cross-sectional analyses to calculate CMFs for fixed roadway lighting and allocation of lane and shoulder widths.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods showed that crash frequency was reduced with increasing shoulder width. Gross and Donnell [19] used two methods to determine crash modification factors (CMFs). Their study utilized case-control and cross-sectional analyses to calculate CMFs for fixed roadway lighting and allocation of lane and shoulder widths.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature shows that the obtained values are reasonable for such models[25] [29]. However, all crashes and all lane-departure crashes may overestimate the safety effectiveness of the treatments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Equation 1 shows the general form of the negative binomial regression model which is modified for the crash frequency modeling [24] [25].…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers applied this method to calculate CMFs for the effects of lane width, shoulder width, and presence of edge-line marking for frontage roads, and median width for freeways and rural multilane highways [22]. However, the cross-sectional method sometimes overestimates the effect of the countermeasure due to the presence of confounding variables, whereas case-control method estimates the casual-effects while controlling impacts of confounding variables [23]. Although this method can be used to investigate the effect of multiple countermeasures, the data collection and sample selection become very complex in case of multiple countermeasures [24].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%