2009
DOI: 10.1097/sla.0b013e31819a6f17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Case Managers in Mass Casualty Incidents

Abstract: During an MCI, case managers increase surge capacity by improving efficacy (workup/treatment times and use of resources) and may improve patient care via increased personal accountability, continuity of care, and involvement in treatment decisions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43]48,49,53 All observational studies were cohort studies; all but four were retrospective. 32,42,43,46 Eight studies described interventions to improve care during times of capacity strain, [55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62] none using randomization to assign treatment category. Outcomes for children were separately analyzed in only six of the observational studies 23,26,32,45,46,51 and none of the experimental studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43]48,49,53 All observational studies were cohort studies; all but four were retrospective. 32,42,43,46 Eight studies described interventions to improve care during times of capacity strain, [55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62] none using randomization to assign treatment category. Outcomes for children were separately analyzed in only six of the observational studies 23,26,32,45,46,51 and none of the experimental studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We did not find any randomized studies of interventions to improve care during times of capacity strain; all but one of the eight experimental studies utilized historical controls only 60 ( Table 2). Types of interventions varied greatly and included interventions to increase bed availability, 55,58,59,62 decrease inefficiency and improve patient flow in busy hospitals, 57,61 coordinate care during mass casualty incidents, 56 and limit spread of an emerging infectious illness during an epidemic. 60 Interventions were not associated with improved health outcomes in any studies; seven studies described postintervention improvements in time-based measures (e.g., hospital LOS, time to surgery), ambulance diversion, or use of non-trauma ICUs for trauma patients.…”
Section: Benefits and Harms Of Interventions To Improve Care During Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following abstract and article review for relevance, a total of 313 articles addressing surge and surge capacity remained. Following detailed text review, 50 quantitative and 11 concept papers (consensus conference recommendations) met all inclusion criteria (Tables A–E and Data Supplement S1, available as supporting information in the online version of this paper). Of the quantitative articles judged relevant, 31 articles focused on criteria and methods for decision‐making for scarce resource allocation, 16 were related to effective triage protocols, nine concerned key decision makers for surge‐capacity planning and evaluating response efficacy, seven addressed meeting workforce needs, and seven were related to developing communication and information‐sharing strategies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 The secondary transfer of patients-that is, the evacuation of patients from one hospital to another-is challenging. However, it may be the best option.…”
Section: Composition Of Casualties In Mass-casualty Incidents In Isramentioning
confidence: 99%