2021
DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.7257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Case – Prostate-specific antigen bounce: A pitfall in prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography interpretation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Integration of earlier PET-based response assessment, compared to triggered restaging at the time of BF, may provide an opportunity for earlier targeted salvage, but a lack of prospective longitudinal series of men so monitored is a gap in the current evidence base ( 23 ). Indeed, reports of false-positive PET scans in previously treated patients underscore the importance of systematically characterizing the normal patterns of PSMA PET/CT changes after SBRT and their correlation with clinical endpoints ( 48 , 49 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Integration of earlier PET-based response assessment, compared to triggered restaging at the time of BF, may provide an opportunity for earlier targeted salvage, but a lack of prospective longitudinal series of men so monitored is a gap in the current evidence base ( 23 ). Indeed, reports of false-positive PET scans in previously treated patients underscore the importance of systematically characterizing the normal patterns of PSMA PET/CT changes after SBRT and their correlation with clinical endpoints ( 48 , 49 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%