2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Case report: Coincidental inclusion in a 17-locus Y-STR mixture, wrongful conviction and exoneration

Abstract: We report the case of a suspect (Suspect-3) who was convicted (and later exonerated) of participating in the multiple-attacker rape of two women. The forensic evidence against him was his inclusion in a 17-marker Y-STR mixture isolated from semen on one victim's clothing. The DNA inclusion produced a match statistic with a combined probability of inclusion of 1 in 741, and a Likelihood Ratio of 3296. While the defense team was told that Suspect-3 was included in the semen DNA mixture, they were not told that a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a rare case of wrongful conviction by Y-STR profiling took place after an innocent individual was convicted for 2 years due to a coincidental match of a 17loci Y-STR profile in an alleged case of sexual assault. Re-evaluation was carried out after the conviction, using 23 loci, where 2 loci did not match the suspect, and the guilty verdict for the alleged suspect was reversed 11 .…”
Section: Y Chromosome Str Profilingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a rare case of wrongful conviction by Y-STR profiling took place after an innocent individual was convicted for 2 years due to a coincidental match of a 17loci Y-STR profile in an alleged case of sexual assault. Re-evaluation was carried out after the conviction, using 23 loci, where 2 loci did not match the suspect, and the guilty verdict for the alleged suspect was reversed 11 .…”
Section: Y Chromosome Str Profilingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although, in numerous cases, jurisdictions make use of the benefits that lineage marker analysis can bring, they do however have strong limitations in forensic applications, specifically, conclusions may not be drawn on the individual level as would be otherwise desirable [149][150][151]. Although haplotype markers usually are not included as standard markers in police databases, similarly to the Internet-based STR information resource [9,152], haplotype databases have also been designed to store haplotypes from global populations.…”
Section: Brief History Of Uniparental Lineage Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In assessing the evidentiary significance of a Y-STR profile, an estimate of the rarity of a Y-STR haplotype in the population is commonly determined by practitioners using the "counting method" in which the number of times a Y-STR profile appears within the database is used to obtain a conditional probability [7], although other methods beyond simply counting Y-STR haplotypes for single-source male samples such as the Discrete Laplace (DL) and Kappa methods have been recommended [8][9][10][11][12]. While these haplotype databases and the counting method are relatively easily used for the analysis of singlesource DNA profiles, their use with Y-STR mixtures becomes much more complex and impractical, especially if distinct major and minor contributors are not present [13,14]. For Y-STR mixtures, several interpretation solutions have been proposed including, for example, a DL-based approach [15], a "haplotype centered" (HC) likelihood ratio derivation method [13] and an ingenious adaptation of the existing mathematical theory of autosomal DNA mixture interpretation to the haploid situation [16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%