2017
DOI: 10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20171120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Case report on laurence moon biedyl syndrome

Abstract: Laurence moon Biedyl syndrome is a rare autosomal recessive condition with a wide spectrum of clinical features. The accepted major criteria for diagnosis include retinal dystrophy, obesity, Polydactyly, male hypogonadism, mental retardation and renal dysfunction. We have presented a 36 year old male patient exhibiting characteristic features of Laurence moon Biedyl syndrome and then the literature is reviewed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main characteristics are retinitis pigmentosa with impairment mainly of the night and peripheral vision, nystagmus, polydactyly, marked central type obesity, mental retardation, hypogonadism, and renal dysfunction. Other signs that can be met are hepatic fibrosis, diabetes mellitus, neurological and speech deficiency, progressive weakness leading to paraplegia, behavior disorders, brachycephalia, facial dysmorphism, dental anomalies, and congenital heart block [2, 3]. The full range of features occurs in only 40-45% of cases [4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main characteristics are retinitis pigmentosa with impairment mainly of the night and peripheral vision, nystagmus, polydactyly, marked central type obesity, mental retardation, hypogonadism, and renal dysfunction. Other signs that can be met are hepatic fibrosis, diabetes mellitus, neurological and speech deficiency, progressive weakness leading to paraplegia, behavior disorders, brachycephalia, facial dysmorphism, dental anomalies, and congenital heart block [2, 3]. The full range of features occurs in only 40-45% of cases [4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%