Case Report: Restoration of Edentulous Mandible With 4 Boi Implants in an Immediate Load Procedure

Ihde, Stefan; Eber, M

doi:10.5507/bp.2004.036

Cited by 5 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Unlike the two-stage surgical technique used to place root-form implants, BOI implants allow for a single surgical procedure with immediate implant loading, even in patients with limited vertical bone supply [19,24]. The estimated decrease in cost is ~ 50% [18] compared to treatment protocols requiring augmentations. The decrease in total treatment time can reach up to 98%.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of implant survival with implants placed in acceptable and compromised bone: a literature review

Ihde¹,

Kopp²,

Maier³

2009

J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Survival rates for conventional dental implant systems are relatively high in normal healthy bone. However, there are subgroups of patients that are at an increased risk of implant failure. In particular, patients with compromised quantity or quality of bone present a significant challenge to the dental implantologist. Objective To perform a review of the literature in an attempt to quantify the relative risk of implant failure in compromised bone compared to good or acceptable bone and to identify whether certain anatomical regions are at greater risk. Search Strategy We conducted a systematic electronic database search of Medline, Cinhahl and the Cochrane Library through March 2006 identifying articles meeting the eligibility criteria. Results We calculated an increased risk of implant failure in compromised bone compared to healthy bone in both the maxilla and the mandible using conventional dental implant systems. Relative risks ranged from 2 to 12 with the highest risk of failure in the maxilla. Conventional systems are often used in combination or after bone augmentation procedures or more innovative methods for stimulating bone growth in patients with compromised bone. These approaches do have their limitations including high costs, the accumulation of the surgical risks, and delayed time to loading. Discussion Quantifying the risk of implant failure in patients with compromised bone should assist the implantologist in treatment decision making and patient counseling. Alternative methods for treating patients with compromised bone include zygomatic and lateral implants, neither of which typically require bone augmentation procedures. More studies are needed to evaluate their safety and efficacy.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of implant survival with implants placed in acceptable and compromised bone: a literature review

Ihde¹,

Kopp²,

Maier³

2009

J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Dental implants for insertion from the lateral aspects of the jaw bone have been described repeatedly, since 1972 [12]. The term basal implant refers to the principles of utilizing basal bone and cortical areas free of infection and resorption.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Basally Osseointegrated Implants as a Viable Immediate Solution in Cases of Failed Implants in Atrophic Posterior Maxillary Region: A Case Report

Vaibhav¹

2018

ADOH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Therefore, it is essential to assess the implant stability at different time points to ensure a successful osseointegration. [ 27 ]…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To overcome this, Ihde introduced basal implants. [ 27 28 ] The philosophy of placement of basal implant differs from conventional implantological thinking since the possibility of mounting prostheses does not depend on the presence of vertical bone, alveolar bone, or the presence of bone in the area of the desired tooth. However, sometimes, esthetical and phonetic problems have to be addressed in a different manner.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Implant survival between endo-osseous dental implants in immediate loading, delayed loading, and basal immediate loading dental implants a 3-year follow-up

Garg

Mishra

Alexander

et al. 2017

Ann Maxillofac Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction:With introduction of the term “ossteointegration of dental implant” by Branemark, advancement in implantology from 1957 to 2017 has come a long way with modification in implant type and in loading time. This study aims to evaluate the survival of endo-osseous immediate loading (IL) implant and basal IL implants in atrophic jaws with objective to compare implant survival in atrophic jaws for full mouth rehabilitation between endo-osseous IL versus endo-osseous delayed loading (DL) versus basal IL during 3-year follow-up.Materials and Methods:Fifty-two (34 endo-osseous and 18 basal) implants were placed in 4 patients requiring full mouth rehabilitation in atrophic jaws. Case 1: Endo-osseous DL implants in upper and lower arch, Case 2: Endo-osseous IL implants in upper and lower arch, Case 3: Basal IL implant in upper and lower arch, and Case 4: Endo-osseous DL in upper arch and basal IL implant in the lower arch. Intraoperative evaluation was done on the basis of pain (visual analog scale [VAS]), operative time, and initial primary implant stability. Postoperative evaluation was done on pain (VAS), infection, radiographically successful implant (orthopantomogram), and patient satisfaction (Grade 0–10).Results:All cases showed satisfactory results but more amount of intra- and post-operative pain was felt with immediate basal implants.Conclusion:We believe that clinicians should comply with patient requests, and for this reason, we agree with some authors to use minimally invasive techniques and to avoid when possible esthetic or functional problems associated with the use of removable prosthesis after teeth extractions.

show abstract

Case Report: Restoration of Edentulous Mandible With 4 Boi Implants in an Immediate Load Procedure

Cited by 5 publications

References 9 publications

Comparison of implant survival with implants placed in acceptable and compromised bone: a literature review

Comparison of implant survival with implants placed in acceptable and compromised bone: a literature review

Basally Osseointegrated Implants as a Viable Immediate Solution in Cases of Failed Implants in Atrophic Posterior Maxillary Region: A Case Report

Implant survival between endo-osseous dental implants in immediate loading, delayed loading, and basal immediate loading dental implants a 3-year follow-up

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About