2020
DOI: 10.3897/jucs.2020.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Case Study of Spatial Pattern Description, Identification and Application Methodology

Abstract: In this case study the authors created and tested a configurable and expandable spatial patterns (SP) description, identification, and application methodology (SPDIAM) and an SP identification algorithm. SPDIAM allows urban planning and design (UPD) practitioners to describe SP in a computerized manner, identify SP automatically and then apply them in the UPD domain. SPDIAM is based on the space syntax (SS) method and normalized spatial and non-spatial measures and can be used with the statistical social, econ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There were five spatial analysis methods-agent-based modelling, cellular automata, fractal analysis, space syntax, and SPDIAM that were compared using the qualitative descriptive method [24]. The features of the possible SP identification methods are compared focusing on three groups of criteria: (a) CSS modelling [11,23,[25][26][27][28][29], (b) method implementation [11,23,25,28], and (c) method application [23,[25][26][27][28]. Such method implementation aspects as source code, type of agent, coding language, API for model development, integrated development environment, operating system, or implementation platform [25] have not been compared, as currently there are too many different options that can be applied to each method, thus the implementation method alone does not bring enough added value to the method.…”
Section: Quantitative Spatial Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…There were five spatial analysis methods-agent-based modelling, cellular automata, fractal analysis, space syntax, and SPDIAM that were compared using the qualitative descriptive method [24]. The features of the possible SP identification methods are compared focusing on three groups of criteria: (a) CSS modelling [11,23,[25][26][27][28][29], (b) method implementation [11,23,25,28], and (c) method application [23,[25][26][27][28]. Such method implementation aspects as source code, type of agent, coding language, API for model development, integrated development environment, operating system, or implementation platform [25] have not been compared, as currently there are too many different options that can be applied to each method, thus the implementation method alone does not bring enough added value to the method.…”
Section: Quantitative Spatial Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SPDIAM can be used in any of these fields as we can use the same steps to describe, identify, and apply different types of SP in various application fields. Only the principle of how to collect the input data that make up SP can differ, but the whole procedure is the same as described in [11].…”
Section: Spatial Pattern In Territorial Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations