2017
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/aef.21.102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Case Study on Modeling Fire Action Complexity in Fire Safety Engineering of Structures

Abstract: Important goals in the fire safety design, such as preventing loss of life and goods damage, are achieved by maintaining the stability of structures exposed to fire for a period of time established by norms and standards. Real fire scenarios confirm that the specific technical regulations which actually have a prescriptive character (both national and international) do not deal with sufficient possibilities regarding the assessment of structural fire safety. The new approach on structural safety, based on engi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, areas that are indirectly affected by impact activities, such as a few metres away from a detonation site, may provide no visual indication for performing a safety test yet have subsurface-level defects that create structural safety concerns. Although near an area of impact action, an expert may be unwilling to carry out a structural safety test due to less likelihood of structural damage than in areas directly affected by impact action [8]. An expert to carry out a test for someone concerned can also be expensive, and training, equipment, and safety concerns make a civilian performing the test impractical.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, areas that are indirectly affected by impact activities, such as a few metres away from a detonation site, may provide no visual indication for performing a safety test yet have subsurface-level defects that create structural safety concerns. Although near an area of impact action, an expert may be unwilling to carry out a structural safety test due to less likelihood of structural damage than in areas directly affected by impact action [8]. An expert to carry out a test for someone concerned can also be expensive, and training, equipment, and safety concerns make a civilian performing the test impractical.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper uses a thermal imaging technique as an alternative approach for contactless NDT of concrete for detecting subsurface defects by measuring the temperatures at the material's surface. In thermal imaging, the regions of defects have different densities, heat capacities, and heat conductivities compared to the surrounding concrete and thus get differentiated out and identified [8], [9], [10]. This act of identification would be timeconsuming and difficult for an expert and so is replaced by an artificial intelligence (AI) system trained on a large dataset of normal and defected concrete (see section \ref{dataset}).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%