2007
DOI: 10.1109/vts.2007.21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Case Study: Soft Error Rate Analysis in Storage Systems

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This work is done based on our collaboration with a major industrial information computing system manufacturer. This work complements the work done in [7], which analyzed field data for computing SER in FPGA-based designs. Since the internal structure of the microprocessor is not observable at the system level, determining soft error rates using field data for microprocessors is more challenging compared to performing the same study for FPGA-based designs.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This work is done based on our collaboration with a major industrial information computing system manufacturer. This work complements the work done in [7], which analyzed field data for computing SER in FPGA-based designs. Since the internal structure of the microprocessor is not observable at the system level, determining soft error rates using field data for microprocessors is more challenging compared to performing the same study for FPGA-based designs.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Field data analysis is traditionally used in industry to evaluate system failure rates, monitor system reliability, and conduct long-term trend analysis to identify the need for future design changes [ [7]. In the case of FPGAs, the configuration bits can be read out and checked for bit-flips.…”
Section: Seus In the Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our best knowledge, this is the first attempt to validate a system-level soft error modeling tool using real and comprehensive field failure data. Preliminary results of this case study were presented in [28].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%