1987
DOI: 10.1016/0141-0229(87)90109-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Casein micelles: structure, properties and enzymatic coagulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, milkfat globule size and concentration have shown large FIBER OFMC SENSOR RESPONSE TO MILKFAT 165 effects on absorption measurements (Ben-Gera and Noms 1968). The average particle diameter of casein micelles falls in the range of 130 to 160 nm (Ruettimann and Ladisch 1987) and milkfat in the form of globules in the range of 0.1 to 1.5 pm.…”
Section: Milk Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, milkfat globule size and concentration have shown large FIBER OFMC SENSOR RESPONSE TO MILKFAT 165 effects on absorption measurements (Ben-Gera and Noms 1968). The average particle diameter of casein micelles falls in the range of 130 to 160 nm (Ruettimann and Ladisch 1987) and milkfat in the form of globules in the range of 0.1 to 1.5 pm.…”
Section: Milk Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To induce precipitation, about 90% of the j-casein chains needs to be cleaved. 16 The aspartic protease chymosin has its highest activity at pH 3-4 and it is the only enzyme known to specifically cleave the Phe 105 -Met 106 peptide bond in j-casein, resulting in separation of j-casein. 17,18 This process is commonly used in cheesemaking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since many of the technologically important properties of milk, e.g., its white colour, stability to heat or ethanol and coagulation by rennet, are due to the properties of the casein micelles, there has been an economic and technological incentive to characterize their properties and elucidate their structure. An extensive literature on these subjects has accumulated and has been reviewed at regular intervals (e.g., de Kruif, 1998de Kruif, , 1999de Kruif & Holt, 2003;Farrell, 1973;Farrell & Thompson, 1974;Fox, 2003;Fox & Kelly, 2004;Garnier, 1973;Garnier & Ribadeau-Dumas, 1970;Holt, 1992Holt, , 1994Holt & Horne, 1996;Horne, 1998Horne, , 2002McMahon & Brown, 1984;McMahon & McManus, 1998;Morr, 1967;Payens, 1966Payens, , 1979Payens, , 1982Rollema, 1992;Rose, 1969;Ruettimann & Ladisch, 1987;Schmidt, 1980Schmidt, , 1982Slattery, 1976;Slattery & Evard, 1973;Tuinier & de Kruif, 2002;Visser, 1992;Walstra, 1990Walstra, , 1999Walstra, Geurts, Noomen, Jellma, & van Boekel, 1999;Walstra & Jenness, 1984;Waugh, 1971).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%