Cash cropping and food crop productivity: synergies or trade‐offs?

Abstract

The case for promoting export-oriented cash crops in Africa has generally been based on their direct potential contribution to agricultural productivity and small farmer incomes. A relatively neglected avenue of research concerns the synergistic effects that cash cropping can have on other household activities, including food production. The conventional view that cash crops compete with food crops for land and labour neglects the potential for cash crop schemes to make available inputs on credit, management training, and other resources that can contribute to food crop productivity, which might otherwise not be accessible to farmers if they did not participate in cash crop programs. This article builds on previous research by hypothesising key pathways by which cash crops may affect food crop activities and empirically measuring these effects using the case of cotton in Gokwe North District in Zimbabwe. Analysis is based on instrumental variable analysis of survey data on 430 rural households in 1996. Results indicate that_.after controlling for household assets, education and locational differences-households engaging intensively in cotton production obtain higher grain yields than non-cotton and marginal cotton producers. We also find evidence of regional spill-over effects whereby commercialisation schemes induce second round investments in a particular area that provide benefits to all farmers in that region, regardless of whether they engage in that commercialisation scheme. The study suggests that the potential spill-over benefits for food crops through participation in cash crop programs are important to consider in the development of strategies designed to intensify African food crop production.

Food availability and livelihood strategies among rural households across Uganda

“…In addition, cash crops have beneficial effects on the overall farm, as they generate money for households to reinvest in their food crops. This reinvestment can increase the productivity of the food crops and thereby benefit household food security (Govereh and Jayne 2003). Indeed, the contribution of cash crops (e.g.…”

Improved production systems for traditional food crops: the case of finger millet in western Kenya

“…Based on previous adoption studies (Feder, Umali 1993;Govereh, Jayne 2003;Matuschke, Qaim 2009;Wollni et al 2010), we identify four categories of variables that have a potential influence on the adoption decision of farmers: social networks and connectedness, wealth, human capital, and regional heterogeneity.…”

Plantations, outgrowers and commercial farming in Africa: agricultural commercialisation and implications for agrarian change

“…As the papers in this Forum show, these outcomes are structured by the interactions among commercial farming models (of different kinds and scales), local farming sectors (already differentiated) and the rural non-farm economy. While several studies have addressed the relative efficiency of different scales and forms of commercial farming, in terms of land and labour productivity (Govereh and Jayne 2003;Lipton 2012;Dzanku 2015), our attention is on dynamics of agrarian change rather than factor productivity.…”