2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cash flow asymmetry: Causes and implications for conditional conservatism research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
113
0
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
113
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous studies verify this asymmetric effect and show that it varies in agreement with conservatism theory (e.g., Ball et al 2000;Watts 2003b;Ball et al 2013;Collins et al 2014a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Numerous studies verify this asymmetric effect and show that it varies in agreement with conservatism theory (e.g., Ball et al 2000;Watts 2003b;Ball et al 2013;Collins et al 2014a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…While accrual asymmetry is often interpreted as conditional conservatism (e.g., Basu 1997;Ball and Shivakumar 2006;Collins et al 2014a), it could reflect asymmetric operational effects, such as cost stickiness (Banker et al 2016b) or curtailment (Lawrence et al 2016). In Table 7, we examine some of these alternative explanations.…”
Section: Tests Of Alternative Explanations For Accrual Asymmetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, the results show that the operating cash flow has a lower contribution in the measurement of the asymmetry coefficient (Jarva 2010: 1). Similarly, Collins et al (2014) found that CFO asymmetry does not signal for recognizing unrealized gains versus unrealized losses.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 94%