2012
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2186408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cash or Food Security through the Public Distribution System? Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial in Delhi, India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rs 200 was the equivalent of 10.5 kg of wheat in New Delhi and 5.9 kg of rice in Chennai in January 2013 (FAO GIEWS retail price). This compares with a randomised control trial in Delhi, India in 2010–2011 which offered Rs 1,000 in unconditional cash transfer per household (Gangopadhyay et al ., ).…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rs 200 was the equivalent of 10.5 kg of wheat in New Delhi and 5.9 kg of rice in Chennai in January 2013 (FAO GIEWS retail price). This compares with a randomised control trial in Delhi, India in 2010–2011 which offered Rs 1,000 in unconditional cash transfer per household (Gangopadhyay et al ., ).…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to poorer households, in wealthier households access to subsidized rice is related to greater additional rice consumption. The results of this study provide further evidence that, in their current form, India's food subsidies may not yield nutritional benefits (R. Jensen and Miller, 2011;Kochar, 2005;Tarozzi, 2005) and may incentivise consumption of nutritionally inferior food items (Ecker and Qaim, 2011;Gangopadhyay et al, 2013), especially in wealthier households.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Some studies of rice and wheat consumption find adverse associations with nutritional outcomes (Gangopadhyay et al, 2013;R. Jensen and Miller, 2011;Tarozzi, 2005), while others find no such link (Ecker and Qaim, 2011;Kochar, 2005).…”
Section: Public Distribution System (Pds)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, transfers again are made only to women, price data are not available, and nutrient elasticities and spillovers are not studied. Gangopadhyay, Lensink, and Yadav (2012) show positive reduced-form impacts of a UCT program in India on calorie consumption, but do not estimate elasticities. Thus, estimates of the income elasticity of food expenditure and calories based on unconditional cash transfers are scarce, especially with price controls.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%