2022
DOI: 10.18235/0004568
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cash transfers in the context of carbon pricing reforms in Latin America and the Caribbean

Abstract: One reason carbon prices are difficult to implement is that they might imply high additional costs on poor and vulnerable households. In response, studies often highlight that recycling revenues through cash transfers can render carbon pricing reforms progressive. This neglects that existing cash transfer programs target households from low-income groups often imperfectly and that impacts of a carbon price are heterogeneous within income groups. In this study we analyze the role of existing cash transfer schem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, designing and implementing carbon pricing and redistributive policy instruments might be challenging for EMDEs with low state capacity and large informal sectors (Aleksandrova 2020 ). For example, in Latin America, even while compensation could be achieved for poor and vulnerable households with 30 percent of carbon pricing revenues on average (Vogt-Schilb et al 2019 ), characteristics which drive exposure to carbon pricing vary widely across countries and even within income groups-consequently, existing cash transfer programs do not cover all of the poorest, most vulnerable households, calling for a bespoke approach to revenue recycling (Missbach et al 2022 ).…”
Section: Carbon Pricing and Redistribution Fossil Fuel Subsidiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, designing and implementing carbon pricing and redistributive policy instruments might be challenging for EMDEs with low state capacity and large informal sectors (Aleksandrova 2020 ). For example, in Latin America, even while compensation could be achieved for poor and vulnerable households with 30 percent of carbon pricing revenues on average (Vogt-Schilb et al 2019 ), characteristics which drive exposure to carbon pricing vary widely across countries and even within income groups-consequently, existing cash transfer programs do not cover all of the poorest, most vulnerable households, calling for a bespoke approach to revenue recycling (Missbach et al 2022 ).…”
Section: Carbon Pricing and Redistribution Fossil Fuel Subsidiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these good practices are(Skovgaard and Van Asselt, 2018): (i) act at the right time, whether due to low fuel prices or political popularity, or in the context of a broader reform of the energy sector; (ii) involve early a wide range of stakeholders as well as different sectors of government; (iii) effectively communicate the subsidy reform, providing information on grant amounts and how funds spent on these subsidies could be redirected to other purposes; and (iv) implement compensatory measures for the main affected parties.18 Regarding compensatory measures, see, for example,Metcalf (2019). See alsoMissbach, Steckel, and Vogt-Schilb (2023) for a discussion relevant to LAC.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%