2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.abb.2008.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Caspase-mediated cleavage of the signal-transducing IL-6 receptor subunit gp130

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results indicate that AR‐42 exerts an important inhibitory effect on the IL‐6 signal transduction pathway by downregulating the expression of gp130 and inhibiting constitutive and inducible STAT3 phosphorylation. While the mechanism by which gp130 is down regulated remains uncertain, the relatively late time course at which this effect is observed (24 hr) likely indicates that this occurs at the transcription level rather than degradation of the receptor subunit 47, 48. Furthermore, inhibition of STAT3 phosphorylation may further contribute to this effect on gp130 as previously reported 47.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Our results indicate that AR‐42 exerts an important inhibitory effect on the IL‐6 signal transduction pathway by downregulating the expression of gp130 and inhibiting constitutive and inducible STAT3 phosphorylation. While the mechanism by which gp130 is down regulated remains uncertain, the relatively late time course at which this effect is observed (24 hr) likely indicates that this occurs at the transcription level rather than degradation of the receptor subunit 47, 48. Furthermore, inhibition of STAT3 phosphorylation may further contribute to this effect on gp130 as previously reported 47.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…For example, IL-27, LIF and CNTF interaction with both their receptors and gp-130 can transiently inhibit the signaling capacity of other family members, in particular IL-6 (Zvonic et al 2005 ; Skiniotis et al 2008 ). Alternatively, the undesired effects may be explained by the degradation of the LIFR and protein gp-130 mediated by caspases and lysosomal enzymes (Zvonic et al 2005 ; Graf et al 2008 ). Finally, we do not know if IL-6 trans-signaling through the soluble IL-6R amplify IL-6 signaling in skeletal muscle of the cachectic patient.…”
Section: Final Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specificity of RT-PCR has been controlled by no template and no RT controls. Semiquantitative PCR results were obtained as described previously [14]. Threshold values were normalized to HPRT1 and set in reference to unstimulated control cells.…”
Section: Real-time Pcrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thereby, bile acids have been shown to affect the function of cytokine-driven effector mechanisms of innate immunity, as well as the function of cells of innate and adaptive immunity, including monocytes, macrophages, NK cells, and T cells. Hence, bile acids affect intracellular signaling in response to type I IFNs or cytokines, such as IL-6, and subsequent gene expression in immune cells, such as NK cells or lymphocytes, as well as in epithelial cells, such as hepatocytes [11][12][13][14][15]. Moreover, bile acids alter the primary humoral response in human monocytes by inhibition of cell proliferation and exocytosis of Ig [16], and a variety of different reports indicates that they substantially impair macrophage functions, including phagocytic activity, as well as production of the cytokines TNF-␣ or IL-6, in response to inflammatory stimuli, such as LPS [17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%