Cast-Based Guided Implant Placement and Prosthetic Rehabilitation of a Single Edentulous Space: Case Report and Systematic Analysis of Surgical Guides Used in Implant Dentistry

Chopra, Megha; Kumar, Manjit; Vermani, Mayank; Swarup, Neeti

doi:10.1615/jlongtermeffmedimplants.2021039395

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, it is widely believed that implant insertion must be guided by prosthetics rather than bone. Preplanned implant positioning and correct angulation are the main tools for successful implant-supported restoration [ 4 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Modified Ridge-Splitting Technique to Restore a Completely Edentulous Maxillary Arch With a Cement-Retained Implant Prosthesis

Rahhal,

Awad,

Fayyad

et al. 2023

Cureus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present report describes a technique in which the maxillary bone was molded to the desired location using a series of instruments for ridge-splitting procedures. This technique aims to improve bone quality all around the implants at both the crest and apex locations. In some clinical scenarios, insufficient horizontal bone with less than 3 mm prevents implant placement. Thus, ridge splitting is a treatment of choice, and this technique creates bone expansion to form a better receptor site for endosteal implants. A case report is presented involving a completely edentulous 52-year-old male patient presented to the clinic with a horizontal bone defect. The patient complained of having difficulty eating and wants to improve his smile. In this clinical case, a modified ridge-splitting technique was employed, differing from the conventional procedure that uses mallets, chisels, or osteotomes. A lancet and spatula were used for precise ridge splitting, followed by the placement of four endosseous tapered implants-two on each side (Dentis USA, La Palma, USA). Each implant had a diameter of 3.7 mm and a length of 10 mm. These implants were clinically placed in a single visit, with a torque of 30 N/cm² applied to ensure secure fixation. To accommodate the patient's unique maxillary bone anatomy, 25-degree angulated abutments were chosen for the four implants, ensuring a common path of insertion, and optimal angulation for long-term stability and aesthetics. Subsequently, a cemented provisional dental prosthesis restoration was fitted, and the patient reported satisfaction with both function and aesthetics. After a period of five months of osseointegration, the stability of the implants was assessed using a resonance frequency analyzer, yielding positive results. The average resonance frequency values for the maxillary left (canine and premolar) were ISQ 68 and ISQ 71, respectively, while for the maxillary right (lateral incisor and premolar), the values were ISQ 69 and ISQ 73. These readings indicate satisfactory implant stability following the osseointegration process. The postoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) showed gain to the bone width besides better function and good results concerning the esthetics. This report describes a modified ridge-splitting technique with a predictable and satisfactory outcome that fulfilled the patient's demands. The presented approach overcomes the disadvantages of two-staged implant placement bone grafting procedures and is also a more affordable option for the patient. CBCT evaluation confirmed bone gain with minimal morbidity after the procedure.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%