2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11295-014-0829-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Castanea root transcriptome in response to Phytophthora cinnamomi challenge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
64
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
7
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Calcium dependent genes increased significantly in transcript abundance only 18 DPI (Supplementary Figure S5B). The changes in calcium-related gene response are consistent with physiological measurements of calcium influx upon flax root colonization by F. oxysporum (Olivain et al, 2003), and other fungi (Zhuang et al, 2012; Xiao et al, 2013; Alkan et al, 2015; Serrazina et al, 2015). …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Calcium dependent genes increased significantly in transcript abundance only 18 DPI (Supplementary Figure S5B). The changes in calcium-related gene response are consistent with physiological measurements of calcium influx upon flax root colonization by F. oxysporum (Olivain et al, 2003), and other fungi (Zhuang et al, 2012; Xiao et al, 2013; Alkan et al, 2015; Serrazina et al, 2015). …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Presence of putative resistance proteins, cellulose synthase, regulation of gene expression and hormone signaling may be involved in P . cinnamomi resistance, as it has been suggested by previous studies of tree- Phytophthora interactions [2831]. The strongest evidence that the QTLs identified here underlie resistance candidate genes, corresponds to the mapping of markers associated to resistance proteins (NDR1/HIN1-Like protein 3) [20] and to the mapping of AC_32934_470 and AC_36335_960 markers on LG_E and LG_K, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In Table 1 a characterization of the resistance levels of each genotype is provided. C. crenata (resistant) and C. sativa (susceptible) genotypes were provided by TRAGSA nursery (Grupo TRAGSA-SEPI, Maceda, Spain) and correspond to the genotypes used by Serrazina et al (2015) for root transcriptomes sequencing. Four hybrid genotypes with different responses to P. cinnamomi were selected from the on-going chestnut breeding program (Santos et al, 2015): three C. sativa × C. crenata hybrids (SC55, SC914 and SC903) and a C. sativa × C. mollissima hybrid (SM904), selected as a resistance control.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%