“…Nevertheless, this idealised vision of home has been criticised for failing to recognise the differences between people, including power relations as well as the intersectional realities of gender, race, ethnicity, mobility, sexuality and gender identity and their relationship to place (Blunt and Dowling, 2006;Cresswell, 2004). For example, the home may represent a site of gender oppression (Rose, 1993), restricted movement (Akesson, 2014a), insular nationalism (Massey, 1992) or even the foundation of an occupying state (Weizman, 2007). Home can also be a site of domestic violence, abuse and insecurity.…”