2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.119.030502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cat Codes with Optimal Decoherence Suppression for a Lossy Bosonic Channel

Abstract: We investigate cat codes that can correct multiple excitation losses and identify two types of logical errors: bit-flip errors due to excessive excitation loss and dephasing errors due to quantum backaction from the environment. We show that selected choices of logical subspace and coherent amplitude significantly reduce dephasing errors. The trade-off between the two major errors enables optimized performance of cat codes in terms of minimized decoherence. With high coupling efficiency, we show that one-way q… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
108
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
108
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For even d, instead of utilizing the entire d-dimensional space for each ∆ to store information, one can define the twodimensional subspace µ ∈ {0, d /2} as the new logical qubit and use the complementary subspace to protect said qubit from higher-weight errors. (In the single mode case, a more judicious choice of qubit suppresses errors even more [30]; the same is likely true here, but this is outside the scope of this paper.) For example, the generalized states for M = 2, obtained by taking |µ γ,∆ (3.12) and substituting 2n + µ −→ (S + 1)(2n + µ) , (5.11) (a) (b) Figure 4.…”
Section: B Multimode Generalizationmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For even d, instead of utilizing the entire d-dimensional space for each ∆ to store information, one can define the twodimensional subspace µ ∈ {0, d /2} as the new logical qubit and use the complementary subspace to protect said qubit from higher-weight errors. (In the single mode case, a more judicious choice of qubit suppresses errors even more [30]; the same is likely true here, but this is outside the scope of this paper.) For example, the generalized states for M = 2, obtained by taking |µ γ,∆ (3.12) and substituting 2n + µ −→ (S + 1)(2n + µ) , (5.11) (a) (b) Figure 4.…”
Section: B Multimode Generalizationmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…In an alternative scenario, the recovery channel in Ref. [30] can be implemented after the state has evolved under photon loss for finite κ a t. Such a channel can be implemented continuously via the procedure in Sec. III.D of Ref.…”
Section: Loss Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a quantum error correction code allows reduction of the order of this error to γ t+1 , we say that the quantum code corrects t AD errors. Unsurprisingly, there has been extensive work on quantum error correction codes specialized against correcting amplitude damping errors [15,12,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. Of special note are some previously constructed constant-excitation quantum codes that do offer immunity against the natural dynamics of quantum harmonic oscillators [12,23,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Production of multicomponent states of the first class has been proposed for cavity field [26], but not yet reported. These states are highly important for studying decoherence [29], and for application in quantum computation with qudits, quantum systems with the number of levels higher than two [30,31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%