We studied intron loss in 684 groups of orthologous genes from seven fully sequenced eukaryotic genomes. We found that introns closer to the 3 ends of genes are preferentially lost, as predicted if introns are lost through gene conversion with a reverse transcriptase product of a spliced mRNA. Adjacent introns tend to be lost in concert, as expected if such events span multiple intron positions. Directly contrary to the expectations of some, introns that do not interrupt codons (phase zero) are more, not less, likely to be lost, an intriguing and previously unappreciated result. Adjacent introns with matching phases are not more likely to be retained, as would be expected if they enjoyed a relative selective advantage. The findings of 3 and phase zero intron loss biases are in direct contradiction to an extremely recent study of fungi intron evolution. All patterns are less pronounced in the lineage leading to Caenorhabditis elegans, suggesting that the process of intron loss may be qualitatively different in nematodes. Our results support a reverse transcriptase-mediated model of intron loss.evolution ͉ genome evolution T wo generalities of the intron-exon structure of eukaryotic genes remain unexplained. First, introns in intron-sparse species or in intron-sparse genes cluster near the 5Ј ends of genes (1, 2). Second, intron positions within codons are doubly biased: introns tend to lie between the third base of one codon and the first base of the subsequent codon (phase zero) rather than between the first and second (phase one) or second and third (phase two) bases of a codon; and adjacent introns tend to be of the same phase (3-9).The 5Ј skew could be due to mutation-biased intron loss, selection-biased intron loss, or biased intron gain. If intron loss proceeds by means of gene conversion of the genomic copy of a gene by the reverse transcriptase product of a spliced transcript (RT-mRNAs) (10-15), the 3Ј bias of RT products (12) could cause a higher rate of loss for 3Ј introns (1, 2). Alternatively, possible preferential retention of 5Ј introns could reflect their greater selective importance, possibly due to a greater concentration of regulatory elements (reviewed in ref. 16). Finally, intron gain could favor 5Ј ends of genes for some unappreciated reason.We analyzed intron losses in 684 groups of orthologous genes from seven eukaryotic species, previously analyzed by Rogozin et al. (17). Fig. 1 shows the most likely phylogeny for the species (18). Results calculated assuming the alternative coelomata grouping (19,20) are similar and provided in Tables 3 and 4 and Figs. 6-9, which are published as supporting information on the PNAS web site. For each lineage, we defined introns known to be ancestral to the lineage (KAL) based on presence in both the sister group of the lineage and an outgroup. For example, introns present in a dipteran (Drosophila melanogaster and Anopheles gambiae) or Caenorhabditis elegans as well as a non-animal are KAL for the lineage leading to Homo sapiens. We found that 3Ј KAL intr...