2016
DOI: 10.3847/0067-0049/225/1/11
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Catalog of Ultra-Diffuse Galaxies in the Coma Clusters From Subaru Imaging Data*

Abstract: We present a catalog of ultra-diffuse galaxies (UDGs) in the Coma cluster. UDGs are a subset of low surface brightness (SB) galaxies with very large effective radii defined by van Dokkum et al. We surveyed the Subaru data archive for deep Suprime-Cam/Subaru R-band images, and used data covering the 1°.7 × 2.°7 region of the Coma cluster. The data are ∼1 magnitude deeper than the data of van Dokkum et al (2015a) in limiting SB. This paper explains the details of our sample selection procedure. This UDG catalog … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
406
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(421 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
(181 reference statements)
11
406
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This UDG has an intermediate mass neighbor at a projected distance of 0.6 Mpc (IC 1668 with M * ≈ 4 × 10 9 M ) and two massive neighbors within 1.0 Mpc (UGC 862 and CGCG 502-039, with M * ≈ 3 × 10 10 M ). At the same time, it should be kept in mind that DGSAT I is still found in a relatively low density environment, especially when compared to the vast majority of UDGs discovered to date (e.g., Yagi et al 2016). In fact, even the star-forming UDG progenitors discovered by Román & Trujillo (2017) in nearby compact groups lie at a projected distance of just 0.2−0.3 Mpc from massive neighbors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This UDG has an intermediate mass neighbor at a projected distance of 0.6 Mpc (IC 1668 with M * ≈ 4 × 10 9 M ) and two massive neighbors within 1.0 Mpc (UGC 862 and CGCG 502-039, with M * ≈ 3 × 10 10 M ). At the same time, it should be kept in mind that DGSAT I is still found in a relatively low density environment, especially when compared to the vast majority of UDGs discovered to date (e.g., Yagi et al 2016). In fact, even the star-forming UDG progenitors discovered by Román & Trujillo (2017) in nearby compact groups lie at a projected distance of just 0.2−0.3 Mpc from massive neighbors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the purpose of the XDF observations was to determine the level of background contamination from field UDGs, the physical sizes of XDF objects were calculated assuming they are at the same redshift as A2744. The right-hand panel of Figure 1 shows the sizes, absolute r magnitudes, and stellar masses of A2744 UDG candidates, along with those in Coma from Yagi et al (2016) for comparison. We calculated stellar masses from the F814W magnitudes using the same SSP as above.…”
Section: Ultra-diffuse Galaxy Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UDGs from Yagi et al (2016) in light gray. Since the purpose of the XDF observations was to determine the level of background contamination from field UDGs, the physical sizes of XDF objects were calculated assuming they are at the same redshift as A2744.…”
Section: Ultra-diffuse Galaxy Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Coma (Koda et al 2015;van Dokkum et al 2015a,b;Yagi et al 2016), Virgo (Mihos et al 2015), Fornax (Muñoz et al 2015), A168 (Román & Trujillo 2017a), A2744 (Janssens et al 2017), eight other clusters with redshifts z ∼ 0. 044-0.063 (van der Burg, Muzzin & Hoekstra 2016) and PiscesPerseus supercluster (Martinez-Delgado et al 2016), as well as several galaxy groups (Makarov et al 2015;Toloba et al 2016;Román & Trujillo 2017b;Trujillo et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%