2019
DOI: 10.26879/885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Catalogue and composition of fossil Anthicidae and Ischaliidae (Insecta: Coleoptera)

Abstract: Despite the increasing rate of systematic research on extant tenebrionoid Coleoptera of the Anthicidae and Ischaliidae, their fossil records remained largely unrevised. In the current paper we review all hitherto named ant-like flower beetles and false firecoloured beetles fossils. We suggest 17 fossil species can be reliably assigned to the Anthicidae and three species to the Ischaliidae. We proposed new placements for two fossil Anthicidae taxa: Petratypus nigri Kaddumi, 2005 moved from Anthicidae to Cucujif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, even taking into consideration the deficiencies published in the previous taxonomic generalizations on fossil beetles, such as Handlirsch [1], Rohdendorf [2], Carpenter [3] and others, it is difficult to overestimate their significance in research and usage in different fields of knowledge. In recent decades, publication of numerous separate annotated lists of fossil beetles on separate groups or palaeofaunas provided many very important contributions (for examples, reviews and catalogues [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23], and many others).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, even taking into consideration the deficiencies published in the previous taxonomic generalizations on fossil beetles, such as Handlirsch [1], Rohdendorf [2], Carpenter [3] and others, it is difficult to overestimate their significance in research and usage in different fields of knowledge. In recent decades, publication of numerous separate annotated lists of fossil beetles on separate groups or palaeofaunas provided many very important contributions (for examples, reviews and catalogues [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23], and many others).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%