1975
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2509(75)85063-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Catalyst poisoning and fixed bed reactor dynamics

Abstract: Abstract-The poisoning kinetics of thiophene on Ni-kieselguhr catalysts and the deactivation behavior of nonisothermal fixed bed reactors have been studied experimentally using benzene hydrogenation as a model exothermic reaction. The time dependent axial temperature profiles in the reactors were measured and compared with values evaluated from a dispersion model , the parameters of which have been determined in separate experimentation.Poisoning kinetics were measured in a series of differential reactor exper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
1

Year Published

1976
1976
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(1975) This experiment and Price and Butt ( 1977) 1 tions, it is assumed that hydrogen is present in essentially constant concentration, that the contribution of the poisoning to the energy balance is negligible in comparison to the heat of reaction, and that the poisoning kinetics can be represented as separable. By the latter it is meant that the reaction rate at any time is given by the product of the reaction rate on undeactivated catalyst times the activity variable s determined by the poisoning kinetics, The forms of the rate equations for hydrogenation and poisoning together with the associated kinetic and capacity parameters have been determined in separate experimentation and are discussed elsewhere by Kehoe and Butt (1972b) and Weng et al ( 1975). The kinetic correlations given here have been developed for a rather narrow range of variables characteristic of the low benzene and high hydrogen concentrations employed in the experiments and are not intended to represent a general correlation.…”
Section: As Indicatedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1975) This experiment and Price and Butt ( 1977) 1 tions, it is assumed that hydrogen is present in essentially constant concentration, that the contribution of the poisoning to the energy balance is negligible in comparison to the heat of reaction, and that the poisoning kinetics can be represented as separable. By the latter it is meant that the reaction rate at any time is given by the product of the reaction rate on undeactivated catalyst times the activity variable s determined by the poisoning kinetics, The forms of the rate equations for hydrogenation and poisoning together with the associated kinetic and capacity parameters have been determined in separate experimentation and are discussed elsewhere by Kehoe and Butt (1972b) and Weng et al ( 1975). The kinetic correlations given here have been developed for a rather narrow range of variables characteristic of the low benzene and high hydrogen concentrations employed in the experiments and are not intended to represent a general correlation.…”
Section: As Indicatedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, this type of nonselective poisoning is probably fairly rare, as the data of Figures 3 and 4 would indicate and as we have had occasion to find out in this laboratory for sulfur poisoning of nickel catalysts (Weng et al, 1975). For sintering of supported metals, the rate of loss of active surface appears in most cases to be well correlated by dA dt…”
Section: Deactivationmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…with a and n constants and C, the weight of coke on the catalyst, This has been shown to work on anything from A (alumina) to Z (zeolites); two examples are shown in Figure 20 (Voorhies, 1945;Butt et al, 1975). Note, however, that the correlation is for weight of coke on catalyst, not catalyst activity, so the question of the nature of the relationship between the two again arises.…”
Section: Deactivationmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…As pointed out b y Finlayson, two major drawbacks to FDM solutions of typicel convection-diffusion equations are 1) the numerically generated oscillations that can occur for large Peclet numbers, and 2) the inaccuracies that can occur at sharp gradients over inadequate meshes. Two alternative ways to avoid these problems without an objectionably large number of spatial grid points are 1) to use higher-order differencing approximations[35], or 2) to use an adaptive (variable) mesh [7,15,25,36, 371.Thomson [38] recommends (in agreement with others[39,40]) that usin adative meshes with standard solution methods is pre 8' erah P e to higher-order-accurate schemes with uniform meshes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%