2015
DOI: 10.1016/s1872-2067(15)60875-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Catalyst screening: Refinement of the origin of the volcano curve and its implication in heterogeneous catalysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…6) over Cu 0.07 Ce 0.75 Zr 0.25 O 2-δ . The volcano curve also shows that the stronger (lattice oxygen) or weaker (weakly adsorbed oxygen) adsorption intensities of the different reactants slightly hinder the reactions and desorption processes in heterogeneous catalysis [43].…”
Section: Structure-activity Relationship and The Contribution Of Actimentioning
confidence: 94%
“…6) over Cu 0.07 Ce 0.75 Zr 0.25 O 2-δ . The volcano curve also shows that the stronger (lattice oxygen) or weaker (weakly adsorbed oxygen) adsorption intensities of the different reactants slightly hinder the reactions and desorption processes in heterogeneous catalysis [43].…”
Section: Structure-activity Relationship and The Contribution Of Actimentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Apparently for structure insensitive reactions, when the Gibbs energy of adsorption on poorly and highly coordinated metal sites is negligible, Eq. (38) is simply reduced to a half principle in the original form for the Gibbs energy [24] or a modified form for chemical potentials [14]. For the reactions when large metal/metal oxide clusters are involved a simplified approach can be also used for a rational catalyst screening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later development of the theory for the optimum catalyst was associated with an assessment of the optimal adsorption energies through the use of chemical potential [13][14][15], showing for example that the chemical potential of the adsorbed species on an optimal catalyst is approximately a half sum of the chemical potential of the reactants and products in the gas phase, which is analogous to the conclusion following from [7]. The energy span model [16][17][18] was applied [16] to elucidate the adsorption energy for the optimal catalyst using a generic two-step sequence and considering that either the first or the second steps are determining the rate.…”
Section: +1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the scaling relation indicates that there are linear relationships between adsorption energies of similar adsorbates, and for a complicated system, the energies of all intermediates can usually be related to one or two key intermediates . Therefore, with the BEP and scaling relations, the reaction rate can finally be expressed as a function of the adsorption energy of one or two key intermediates by solving the micro‐kinetics of the catalytic system . As shown in Figure , when the adsorption strength is weak, the whole reaction is limited by the activation of the reactant; if the binding is strong, the desorption of the product would be limited.…”
Section: General Understandings and Relationships In The Rational Desmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the peak of the curve would locate in a moderate bonding strength. With a full analytical derivation of the micro‐kinetics on a two‐step catalytic model, we showed that plotting this function for a heterogeneous catalytic reaction will always lead to a volcano curve, which can be deemed as an essential property, and it is the poison of the surface by intermediates rather than the desorption barrier that limited the desorption process …”
Section: General Understandings and Relationships In The Rational Desmentioning
confidence: 99%