2011
DOI: 10.1002/ange.201105517
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Catalytic [2+2+1] Cross‐Cyclotrimerization of Silylacetylenes and Two Alkynyl Esters To Produce Substituted Silylfulvenes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For both substrates, the achiral complex with the more hindered Cp* ligand generally led to a slower reaction than the chiral complex with a 1,2-disubstituted cyclopentadienyl ligand. [18] As expected, cyclometalation was slower at the hindered ortho positions, and with both rhodium catalysts, longer times were required to reach saturation of the deuteration at the 2 position (Figure 2, right graph). Again, the chiral catalyst Rh3 reacted faster.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…For both substrates, the achiral complex with the more hindered Cp* ligand generally led to a slower reaction than the chiral complex with a 1,2-disubstituted cyclopentadienyl ligand. [18] As expected, cyclometalation was slower at the hindered ortho positions, and with both rhodium catalysts, longer times were required to reach saturation of the deuteration at the 2 position (Figure 2, right graph). Again, the chiral catalyst Rh3 reacted faster.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Under carefully optimized conditions, 60 % of anthracene 3 aa is obtained using [(Cp*RhCl 2 ) 2 ] (Cp* = pentamethylcyclopentadienyl) as catalyst and a combination of copper(II) 2ethylhexanoate and decabromo diphenyl ether as oxidants (entry 1). Both the electron-poor complex reported by Tanaka et al [11] and simple RhCl 3 were less efficient (entries 3-4). The employed oxidant combination is essential for the success of the annulation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Silver salts were detrimental for the reaction outcome (entries [8][9]. Moreover, both acidic and basic additives decrease the yield significantly (entries [10][11]. The reaction proceeded equally well in cyclohexane and less efficiently in dichloroethane, iPr 2 O, and tBuOH (entries [12][13][14][15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upon elevating the reaction temperature to 150 8C, the yield was improved up to 96 % (entry 2). The reaction proceeded quantitatively in the presence of [{Cp E RhCl 2 } 2 ] (Cp E = 1,3-bis(ethoxycarbonyl)-2,4,5-trimethylcyclopentadienyl), which was recently employed for the oxidative coupling of acetanilides with alkynes [12] as a catalyst in place of [{Cp*RhCl 2 } 2 ], even at 130 8C (entry 3). To our surprise, the reaction was effectively Scheme 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%