“…The 29 Si{ 1 H} NMR spectra show a double doublet resonance at δ 83.3 ppm ( 1 J Si–Rh ≈ 35 Hz, 2 J Si–P ≈ 9 Hz; 2a ), 78.7 ppm ( 1 J Si–Rh ≈ 30 Hz, 2 J Si–Rh ≈ 9 Hz; 2b ), 87.9 ppm ( 1 J Si–Rh ≈ 40 Hz, 2 J Si–P ≈ 9 Hz; 3a ), and 85.9 ppm ( 1 J Si–Rh ≈ 36 Hz, 2 J Si–P ≈ 9 Hz; 3b ). Therefore, the 29 Si chemical shift observed for complexes 2a , b and 3a , b (in the range of δ 78.7–87.9 ppm) is clearly low-field shifted in comparison with the 29 Si resonances (δ 41.2–50.7 ppm), recently reported for neutral Rh(III)-(κ 2 -NSi Ar ) (NSi Ar = NSi Me2Q , NSi Me2QMe , NSi Me2AC ) species (Figure ), but compares well with the value of 79.4 ppm found for Rh-{κ 2 -( naphySi )} species (Figure ). The 1 J Rh–Si values found for complexes 2a (35 Hz), 2b (30 Hz), 3a (42 Hz), and 3b (41 Hz) confirm the silyl character of the Rh–Si bond and compare well with those observed in the 29 Si{ 1 H} NMR spectra of [Rh(X)(κ 2 -NSi Me2OPy ) 2 ] species (X = Cl, δ 85.7 ppm, 1 J Si–Rh ≈ 37 Hz; X = κ 2 -O 2 CCF 3 , δ 86.2 ppm, 1 J Si–Rh ≈ 39 Hz) .…”