1986
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-9834(00)82556-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Catalytic combustion of methane over various perovskite-type oxides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

16
196
1
7

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 492 publications
(220 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
16
196
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Data show that LaMnO3 and LaCoO3 were the most active catalysts, while LaFeO3 was the less performing one, in spite of its higher lowtemperature activity through the suprafacial mechanism ( Fig.1), as previously observed [6,7,[16][17][18].…”
Section: -Effect Of the Nature Of B Metal On Activity And Resistance supporting
confidence: 79%
“…Data show that LaMnO3 and LaCoO3 were the most active catalysts, while LaFeO3 was the less performing one, in spite of its higher lowtemperature activity through the suprafacial mechanism ( Fig.1), as previously observed [6,7,[16][17][18].…”
Section: -Effect Of the Nature Of B Metal On Activity And Resistance supporting
confidence: 79%
“…As expected, methane conversion increases with temperature with a sigmoidal profile. Indeed, depending the fixed temperature, different reaction pathway may controls the overall methane catalytic combustion [9,[28][29][30][31]. At low temperature, the combustion is controlled by the surface oxygen vacancies that are activate sites for oxygen adsorption.…”
Section: -6mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lower catalytic activity of the higher Sr-substituted perovskite is due to the structural and valece changes, leading to lower reductin/oxidation capability from the relative rate of dissociation and bulk diffusion of oxide ions [32]. Since the initial stage of the sigmoidal curve is related to a kinetically controlled regime [30,33], the rate of methane combustion was calculated from the conversion values lower than 20% accordingly with equation r = (F gas · X CH4 ) / (V ST P · m cat ), where r(mol·s −1 ·g −1 ) is the reaction rate, F gas (L·s −1 ) is the inlet flow of reactants in, X CH4 is the fractional conversion, V ST P (22.414 L·mol −1 ) is the volume occupied by one mole of gas at Standard Temperature and Pressure condition, m cat (g) is the mass of catalyst. Reaction rates were reported in the Arrhenius plot of fig.12 and the apparent activation energies, E a , for CH 4 disappearance were calculated from the slope of the interpolated data.…”
Section: -6mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of a synthesis route capable of producing MgCr 2 O 4 nanomaterials with controlled size and morphology is important due to their potential applications as smart and functional materials. Various methods, such as solid state reaction (Finocchio et al 1995), sol-gel method (SG) (Andrade et al 2006), co-precipitation (Zhang et al 1987), solution combustion (Arai et al 1986), co-precipitation within reverse micro-emulsion (Rida et al 2010), combustion method (Hosterman et al 2013) and conventional double sintering ceramic technique (Khalaf et al 2016) have been applied in the preparation of pirochromite based nanoparticles. Nevertheless, some of these methods are generally complicated, non-reliable, timeconsuming, and expensive for large scale production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%