2016
DOI: 10.1002/ange.201609844
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Catalytic Enantioselective Arylboration of Alkenylarenes

Abstract: A method for the catalytic enantioselective arylboration of alkenylarenes is disclosed. The reaction leads to the formation of 1,1-diarylalkanes that also incorporate an additional pinacol boronic ester which can be easily transformed to a variety of groups. The products are formed with excellent diastereoselectivities and enantioselectivities.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the disclosure corresponding to the two-catalyst protocol 2 there is no mention of allyl–boron additions to electron-rich aryl alkenes or those involving more hindered (e.g., 2-substituted) electrophiles. Furthermore, enantioselective Cu–B(pin) or Cu–H additions with electron-deficient aryl olefins are either not mentioned 4,5,6,7,8 or found to be less enantioselective 9,10,11,12 (e.g., halo-, trifluoromethyl- or ester-substituted). It is unclear why enantioselectivity is lower with some substrates or at times depends on electrophile identity despite the fact that the Cu–B(pin)/Cu–H addition step is the stereochemistry-determining (e.g., 94% e.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the disclosure corresponding to the two-catalyst protocol 2 there is no mention of allyl–boron additions to electron-rich aryl alkenes or those involving more hindered (e.g., 2-substituted) electrophiles. Furthermore, enantioselective Cu–B(pin) or Cu–H additions with electron-deficient aryl olefins are either not mentioned 4,5,6,7,8 or found to be less enantioselective 9,10,11,12 (e.g., halo-, trifluoromethyl- or ester-substituted). It is unclear why enantioselectivity is lower with some substrates or at times depends on electrophile identity despite the fact that the Cu–B(pin)/Cu–H addition step is the stereochemistry-determining (e.g., 94% e.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our studies begin with investigating the reaction of dienyl uoride E-1a with aldimine ester [38][39][40] 2a to generate α-alkenyl, α-methyl α-AA 3aa. Using the stereocontrol exhibited by Cuazomethine ylides in two-metal catalytic systems 47,48,52,[53][54][55] , we designed a synergistic Pd/Cu catalyst system [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52] for controlling the stereochemistry of the newly formed chiral center by means of an appropriate combination of ligands on the two metals during the coupling step (Table 1). First, we tested Phosferrox Cu complex L1-Cu with Pd catalysts bearing a bisphosphine ligand (dppe, dppp, Xantphos, or DPEphos; L4-Pd-L7-Pd, respectively) and found that none of these combinations catalyzed the desired reaction (entries 1-4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through this mechanism, aryl electrophiles become suitable coupling partners in carboboration reaction, which is not trivial to achieve with Cu as the sole catalyst. [45] In addition, βhydride elimination is no longer a significant issue for the putative alkyl Pd(II) intermediates, as the alkyl group is predomintly carried by Cu in the form of alkylcuprate.…”
Section: Alkene Carboboration By Cooperative Catalysismentioning
confidence: 99%