2019
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.9b04480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Catalytic Enantioselective α-Arylation of Carbonyl Enolates and Related Compounds

Abstract: Optically active α-arylation carbonyl units are widely present in a wide variety of drugs, bioactive natural products, and valuable pharmacologically active molecules. Catalytic enantioselective α-arylation of carbonyl enolates or the related precursors with various arylating agents constitutes a powerful tactic for constructing such privileged scaffolds, which is of great interest and has gained considerable progress. This review summarizes the advances based on two major strategies with diverse arylating age… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
63
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 154 publications
0
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2‐(4‐Methoxyphenyl)‐1,2‐diphenylethanone (2g) . [14a] Following the general procedure and purification by flash chromatography ( n ‐hexane/EtOAc, 9:1), the title compound 2g was obtained as a white solid (145 mg, 76 %) from 1g (200 mg, 0.63 mmol). R f = 0.42 ( n ‐hexane/EtOAc, 9:1); Mp 86–87 °C; 1 H NMR (CDCl 3 , 500 MHz): δ = 3.75 (s, 3H; OCH 3 ), 5.98 (s, 1H; ‐CH), 6.84 (dd, J = 6.5, 1.5 Hz, 2H; ArH), 7.18 (dd, J = 6.5, 1.5 Hz, 2H; ArH), 7.22–7.26 (m, 3H; ArH), 7.30 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H; ArH), 7.38 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H; ArH), 7.48 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H; ArH), 7.99 ppm (dd, J = 8.5, 1.0 Hz, 2H; ArH); 13 C NMR (CDCl 3 , 125.76 MHz): δ = 55.2, 58.6, 114.1, 127.0, 128.58, 128.67, 128.93, 129.03, 130.2, 131.1, 133.0, 136.8, 139.5, 158.6, 198.5 ppm; IR (neat): ν̃ = 3027, 2962, 2896, 2839, 1685 (CO), 1597, 1511, 1445, 1255, 1169 cm –1 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…2‐(4‐Methoxyphenyl)‐1,2‐diphenylethanone (2g) . [14a] Following the general procedure and purification by flash chromatography ( n ‐hexane/EtOAc, 9:1), the title compound 2g was obtained as a white solid (145 mg, 76 %) from 1g (200 mg, 0.63 mmol). R f = 0.42 ( n ‐hexane/EtOAc, 9:1); Mp 86–87 °C; 1 H NMR (CDCl 3 , 500 MHz): δ = 3.75 (s, 3H; OCH 3 ), 5.98 (s, 1H; ‐CH), 6.84 (dd, J = 6.5, 1.5 Hz, 2H; ArH), 7.18 (dd, J = 6.5, 1.5 Hz, 2H; ArH), 7.22–7.26 (m, 3H; ArH), 7.30 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H; ArH), 7.38 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H; ArH), 7.48 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H; ArH), 7.99 ppm (dd, J = 8.5, 1.0 Hz, 2H; ArH); 13 C NMR (CDCl 3 , 125.76 MHz): δ = 55.2, 58.6, 114.1, 127.0, 128.58, 128.67, 128.93, 129.03, 130.2, 131.1, 133.0, 136.8, 139.5, 158.6, 198.5 ppm; IR (neat): ν̃ = 3027, 2962, 2896, 2839, 1685 (CO), 1597, 1511, 1445, 1255, 1169 cm –1 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2‐(Naphthalen‐1‐yl)‐1,2‐diphenylethanone (2j) . [14a] Following the general procedure and purification by flash chromatography ( n ‐hexane/EtOAc, 9:1), the title compound 2j was obtained as a white solid (160 mg, 84 %) from 1j (200 mg, 0.59 mmol). R f = 0.57 ( n ‐hexane/EtOAc, 9:1); Mp 110–111 °C; 1 H NMR (CDCl 3 , 500 MHz): δ = 6.73 (s, 1H; ‐CH), 7.20–7.38 (m, 9H; ArH), 7.45–7.49 (m, 3H; ArH), 7.77 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H; ArH), 7.86–7.87 (m, 1H; ArH), 7.96–7.98 (m, 2H; ArH), 7.99–8.01 ppm (m, 1H; ArH); 13 C NMR (CDCl 3 , 125.76 MHz): δ = 55.9, 123.2, 125.4, 125.8, 126.7, 127.1, 127.3, 128.1, 128.7, 128.79, 128.9, 129.1, 129.6, 131.3, 133.1, 134.2, 135.0, 136.6, 138.1, 198.3 ppm; IR (neat): ν̃ = 3060, 3035, 1682 (CO), 1597, 1449, 1291, 1210, 1177 cm –1 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“… 17 33 However, in spite of these achievements, this research area still suffers many limitations. 34 In this regard, the computational study of this reaction could greatly improve our understanding of its general mechanism by evaluation of the energetics of each possible pathway A–C ( Figure 1 b). Visualization and analysis of the diastereomeric transition structures (TSs) leading to different enantiomeric products could help in understanding the interactions responsible for the observed selectivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%