2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.08.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Catalytic HCl oxidation reaction: Stabilizing effect of Zr-doping on CeO2 nano-rods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While only 75 % of the catalyst is chlorinated in the pure CeO 2 samples, the fitted nucleation rate is substantially lower, possibly indicating that the CeO 2 surface contributes less to nucleation. This assumption is consistent with the earlier conclusion that the surface of residual CeO 2 is entirely covered by CeCl 3 after chlorination (and thereby not available as a site for oxide nucleation), thereby suppressing complete chlorination [11] …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…While only 75 % of the catalyst is chlorinated in the pure CeO 2 samples, the fitted nucleation rate is substantially lower, possibly indicating that the CeO 2 surface contributes less to nucleation. This assumption is consistent with the earlier conclusion that the surface of residual CeO 2 is entirely covered by CeCl 3 after chlorination (and thereby not available as a site for oxide nucleation), thereby suppressing complete chlorination [11] …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…After Ar purging, the catalyst is exposed to a harsh reaction mixture (Ar : HCl : O 2 =9 : 4.5 : 1.5). During 1.5 h on stream, the STY of CeO 2 declines continuously and saturates finally at a residual activity that is likely due to hydrated CeCl 3 [11,18] . In the next step, the deactivated CeO 2 catalyst is reactivated by the mixed atmosphere of O 2 and Ar (Ar : O 2 =7.5 : 7.5).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations