2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2007.07.113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Catalytic reduction of NO in the presence of benzene on a Pt(332) surface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also important for supporting the choice of the Au(110) surface are the previous reports on the structural sensitivity of the reaction of NO x reduction on metallic catalysts. 21,50,[60][61][62][63][64][65][66] The (111) and (110) slab models used in this work consist of 2 × 2 unit cells with respect to the minimal unit cell and have a thickness of four metallic layers. 73 The convergence of the results with the number of atomic layers in the slab was checked in previous works.…”
Section: A Slab Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Also important for supporting the choice of the Au(110) surface are the previous reports on the structural sensitivity of the reaction of NO x reduction on metallic catalysts. 21,50,[60][61][62][63][64][65][66] The (111) and (110) slab models used in this work consist of 2 × 2 unit cells with respect to the minimal unit cell and have a thickness of four metallic layers. 73 The convergence of the results with the number of atomic layers in the slab was checked in previous works.…”
Section: A Slab Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the cleavage of the N-O bond seems to be the crucial step during the reaction of NO reduction. 13,21,[49][50][51] Vinod et al 52 considered the Au(310) surface model catalyst for investigating NO reduction on gold, concluding that the reaction mechanism based on bond dissociation of NO species is more plausible, which is surprising taking into account the high activation energy barrier (E act = ∼3.9 eV) associated to the reaction of NO dissociation on the Au(111) surface. 48 This is a very large value, especially, when compared with the NO dissociation energy barriers on surfaces of more reactive metals such as Ir(100), 53 Rh(111), 54 Rh(100), 55,56 or Rh(211), 54 surfaces, with E act = ∼0.5 eV, ∼1.4 eV, ∼0.4 eV, and ∼0.7 eV, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations