2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcat.2022.112354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Catalytic roles of In2O3 in ZrO2-based binary oxides for CO2 hydrogenation to methanol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The preparation method of In 2 O 3 /ZrO 2 also vitally affects the electronic structure effect, thus to optimize the interaction of In 2 O 3 and ZrO 2 , and the surface exposure degree of In 2 O 3 , four different compositing strategies (liquid-phase coprecipitation, precipitation-coating method, ball milling method, and incipient wetness impregnation, respectively) for the synthesis of In 2 O 3 /ZrO 2 were compared by Gao et al [ 104 ]. It was found that the exposure area of In 2 O 3 prepared by the precipitation-coating method was the highest ( S In = 6.22 m 2 g −1 ), whereas it was lowest ( S In = 1.56 m 2 g −1 ) by the coprecipitation method due to the formation of In 2 O 3 bulk dispersion with ZrO 2 .…”
Section: In 2 O 3 -Based Cataly...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The preparation method of In 2 O 3 /ZrO 2 also vitally affects the electronic structure effect, thus to optimize the interaction of In 2 O 3 and ZrO 2 , and the surface exposure degree of In 2 O 3 , four different compositing strategies (liquid-phase coprecipitation, precipitation-coating method, ball milling method, and incipient wetness impregnation, respectively) for the synthesis of In 2 O 3 /ZrO 2 were compared by Gao et al [ 104 ]. It was found that the exposure area of In 2 O 3 prepared by the precipitation-coating method was the highest ( S In = 6.22 m 2 g −1 ), whereas it was lowest ( S In = 1.56 m 2 g −1 ) by the coprecipitation method due to the formation of In 2 O 3 bulk dispersion with ZrO 2 .…”
Section: In 2 O 3 -Based Cataly...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The catalyst is able to achieve a CO 2 conversion of 7.5 % and space-time yield of methanol reached 0.398 g MeOH •h À 1 •g À 1 cat . [116] However, a precise control of the synthesis condition is required to avoid additional nucleation events or the precipitation of undesired phases. Useful advices include ensuring a complete mixing of the solid precursors of both the active metal and support, and avoiding temperature gradients in the synthesis solution.…”
Section: Co-precipitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with a high In 2 O 3 loading of 10 %. The catalyst is able to achieve a CO 2 conversion of 7.5 % and space‐time yield of methanol reached 0.398 g MeOH ⋅h −1 ⋅g −1 cat [116] . However, a precise control of the synthesis condition is required to avoid additional nucleation events or the precipitation of undesired phases.…”
Section: Catalyst Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The O 1s peaks of all samples can be separated into three peaks at around 529.6, 531.1, and 532.3 eV, which are denoted as lattice oxygen (O lattice ), defect oxygen (O defect ), and adsorbed oxygen species (O OH ), respectively. 38 The percentage of defect oxygen in the total oxygen content represents the oxygen vacancy concentration. In order to quantitatively calculate the oxygen vacancy concentration, all O 1s peaks were processed by peak area calculation, and the results obtained are reported in Table 3: prolonging the reflux time, the proportion of defect oxygen on the surface of the catalysts increases first and then decreases, and the Cu/ZrO 2 -18h catalyst has the highest density of oxygen vacancy.…”
Section: ■ Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%