“…There are few factors that play a role in increased C deposition over Ni/Al 2 O 3 [16] and must be underlined here: (i) the Ni loading, which was 20 wt.%, i.e., twice as high as in the case of Ni/CeZrO 2 (this is very important since Ni is the site for C deposition), (ii) the support, which is not reducible, and unlike CeZrO 2 , does not provide the active oxygen species for suppressing carbon species, and (iii) the contact time as low as 1.6 × 10 −5 s (shorter contact times results in increased coke formation; t c in the present work is 0.36 s). Ni/Al2O3 [16] and must be underlined here: (i) the Ni loading, which was 20 wt.%, i.e., twice as high as in the case of Ni/CeZrO2 (this is very important since Ni is the site for C deposition), (ii) the support, which is not reducible, and unlike CeZrO2, does not provide the active oxygen species for suppressing carbon species, and (iii) the contact time as low as 1.6x10 −5 s (shorter contact times results in increased coke formation; tc in the present work is 0.36 s). Based on the obtained results, the reaction pathways for the formation of filamentous carbon during SRT over Ni/CeZrO 2 can be proposed (Figure 6).…”