2020
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.17696
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Catastrophic Health Expenditures Across Insurance Types and Incomes Before and After the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
38
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that becoming eligible for Medicare at age 65 years was associated with a 27% reduction in OOP spending and a 35% reduction in the risk of catastrophic health care expenditures for older adults from 2014 through 2018. These findings extend those of previous work 4 , 5 , 6 by quantifying the type of spending changes and magnitude of financial risk protection currently associated with Medicare. Despite the substantial health insurance coverage gains attributable to the Affordable Care Act, nearly 9% of adults aged 64 years still experienced CHE from 2014 through 2018.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We found that becoming eligible for Medicare at age 65 years was associated with a 27% reduction in OOP spending and a 35% reduction in the risk of catastrophic health care expenditures for older adults from 2014 through 2018. These findings extend those of previous work 4 , 5 , 6 by quantifying the type of spending changes and magnitude of financial risk protection currently associated with Medicare. Despite the substantial health insurance coverage gains attributable to the Affordable Care Act, nearly 9% of adults aged 64 years still experienced CHE from 2014 through 2018.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Following previous work, 1 , 2 we used a second-order local polynomial regression discontinuity design to evaluate changes associated with Medicare eligibility at age 65 years. Outcomes included insurance coverage (any Medicaid, Medicare, any private or uninsured), mean annual income, mean annual medical charges, mean annual OOP health care spending (exclusive of premiums), CHE (defined as OOP spending ≥40% of annual income minus spending on food and housing), 3 , 4 and delaying care because of affordability.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This occurred in the policy context of coverage expansions under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), which reduced the number of uninsured among non-elderly adult Americans by 41% between 2010 and 2016, 38 and has been associated with a reduction in 2 million US adults facing CHE. 39 However, the present study suggests that this stagnation in CHE risk among treat-and-release ED visits was temporary and has risen since 2016.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…An analysis of national trends in CHE (using a data set that includes actual out-of-pocket payments) suggested that the majority of individuals in the US who experience CHE every year have private health insurance. 39 This suggests that additional strategies are needed to mitigate CHE risk for acute, unscheduled care. Such strategies may include expanding meaningful insurance coverage for when unexpected health problems arise, bolstering state or federal incentives to curb excessive charges, 43 mitigating aggressive financial collection practices, 44 and further assessing payment structures for ED care to ensure that the ED is adequately compensated for its mission and service to the community while not becoming a place to which people hesitate turning to owing to costs alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, patients from low-income families were at higher risk of CHE with private insurance coverage vs Medicaid, in agreement with a recent study of a noncancer population. 31 Underinsurance owing to high premiums likely counterbalanced cost savings from gaining private insurance coverage. It seems that low-income patients with cancer are better protected from CHE by Medicaid coverage than by private insurance coverage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%