Catatan Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh: Hasil Belajar Sains Dan Pembelajarannya Pada Mahasiswa Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar

Syazali, Muhammad; Umar, Umar

doi:10.36987/jes.v9i1.2520

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…One of them is maximizing the function of pedagogy that combines social constructivism and critical theory in learning (Botes & Barnett, 2022). In the PGSD Study Program, the effectiveness of the RPS, especially in science learning, can be observed from student learning achievements in science courses (Syazali & Umar, 2022). In its implementation, learning was carried out during 16 face-to-face meetings, structured assignments, and independent study.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of the Weaknesses of Hybrid Learning During the Pandemic: Case Study in Basic Natural Science (Bns) Lectures

Syazali,

ERFAN,

WAHDAH

2023

JES

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Data on deficiencies regarding preparation, planning, processes and assessment is the information needed to make improvement efforts in the future. Therefore, this research was conducted to analyze the weaknesses of hybrid learning implemented in Basic Natural science (BNS) courses. This qualitative descriptive research was carried out at the Primary Teacher Education (PTE) Study Program during the preparation, planning, learning and assessment of learning outcomes. Qualitative data was collected using observation and documentation methods. The collected data was analyzed using qualitative analysis from Miles and Huberman. The weaknesses of hybrid learning that we found include coordination carried out with senior lecturers whose expertise is non-science education, late submission of SIMAKSI to BKSDA, CPMK is limited to Science Process Skills (SPS), objectives only cover basic SPS, there are no guidelines for preparing reports, science topics are limited to ecosystems, multi tasking, the learning time interval is only two weeks, the SPS instrument only uses tests, and the tests are carried out online. It is hoped that these results can be used as evaluation material in order to improve the implementation of hybrid learning in science courses, especially BNS.Keywords: Basic natural sciences, weaknesses, hybrid learning.AbstrakData kekurangan tentang persiapan, perencanaan, proses dan assessment merupakan informasi yang dibutuhkan untuk melakukan upaya perbaikan dimasa yang akan datang. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini dilakukan untuk menganalisis kelemahan pembelajaran hybrid yang diimplementasikan pada mata kuliah IKD. Penelitian deskriptif kualitatif ini dilaksanakan pada Prodi PGSD selama proses persiapan, perencanaan, pembelajaran sampai dengan penilaian hasil belajar. Data kualitatif dikumpulkan menggunakan metode observasi dan dokumentasi. Data yang terkumpul dianalisis menggunakan analsisi kualitatif dari Miles and Huberman. Kelemahan pembelajaran hybrid yang kami temukan di antaranya koordinasi dilakukan dengan dosen senior yang keilmuannya non-pendidikan sains, telatnya pengajuan SIMAKSI ke BKSDA, CPMK terbatas pada KPS, tujuan hanya mencakup KPS dasar, tidak ada pedoman penyusunan laporan, topik sains dibatasi pada ekosistem, multi tasking, interval waktu pembelajaran hanya dua minggu, instrumen KPS hanya menggunakan tes, dan pelaksanaan tes dilaksanakan secara daring. Hasil ini diharapkan dapat menjadi bahan evaluasi dalam rangka memperbaiki implementasi hybrid learning pada mata kuliah sains khususnya IKD.Kata Kunci: ilmu kealamiahan dasar, kelemahan, pembelajaran hybrid

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of the Weaknesses of Hybrid Learning During the Pandemic: Case Study in Basic Natural Science (Bns) Lectures

Syazali,

ERFAN,

WAHDAH

2023

JES

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Students' science learning outcomes regarding the ability of products and SPS also show a positive trend. The category has reached good with a mastery of 70.97 [7]. This value itself has a grade of B+.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 95%

Analysis of the quality of students science research ideas through the implementation of research-based learning models

Syazali,

Widiada,

Zain

2023

J. Pijar.MIPA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Learning that focuses on achieving product mastery is not optimal in facilitating students to create quality research ideas. In this research, we implemented MPBR to analyze the quality of science research ideas from students. To collect research ideas from students, the documentation method is used. Documents as qualitative instruments obtained through this method are assessed based on four criteria. They are suitability to the scope of scientific studies, the presence of research problems, the accuracy of the editorial title formulated from the research problem, and the urgency of the study variables. The data obtained was analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. The quantitative analysis that we carry out is proportion analysis. The qualitative analysis includes data reduction, visualization, and conclusion. We found that all research ideas are within the scope of scientific studies and are based on research problems. However, only some scientific research ideas have appropriate title formulations, and the variables need to be studied further through the research process. This has implications for the overall quality of research ideas. The quality of research ideas in the outstanding category is 44.06%. The proportion in the good category is 14.68%, and the remainder is in the fair category, with a ratio of 41.26%. The conclusion is that implementing the PBR model effectively trains students to create scientific research ideas based on problems they find in the surrounding environment.

show abstract

“…Hasil belajar sains ini lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan hasil asesmen yang dilakukan pada tahun 2022. Secara rata-rata, nilainya berada pada angka 70.97, di mana grade-nya baik (Syazali & Umar, 2022). Hasil ini adalah evaluasi terhadap penerapan pembelajaran jarak jauh yang diterapkan pada saat pendemi Covid-19.…”

Section: Pembahasanunclassified

Evaluasi Hasil Pembelajaran Sains Melalui Implementasi Studi Independen dan Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Riset (PBR)

Syazali,

Widiada,

Rahmatih

et al. 2024

JIPP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Evaluation of learning outcomes is an important component in the educational process. Primarily in implementing relatively new learning facilities. The aim of this research is to evaluate student science learning outcomes. The sample consisted of 86 students who were facilitated with independent study and the PBR model. Learning outcome data is collected using the documentation method from the final assessment results sheet which becomes the grade on the student's study results card. This data was analyzed descriptively to determine the average size and proportion. To find out the comparison of science learning outcomes between semester 3 and semester 5 students, an inferential analysis was carried out using the independent sample t-test. Our findings show that the average student science learning outcomes are in the good category. As many as 94.2% of students received a pass grade in the science courses they programmed. The results of the inferential analysis that we carried out show that the science learning achievements of semester 3 and semester 5 students are significantly different. Semester 5 has higher science learning outcomes compared to semester 3 students. The results of this research prove that the implementation of independent study and the PBR model is effective in helping students to master the assigned science learning objectives well, and the semester level has a significant effect. However, the quality of the learning process needs to be improved because there is a small percentage (5.8%) whose mastery of science learning objectives cannot be categorized as passing. It is hoped that this improvement can improve their science learning outcomes, so that in the next lesson, they can reach the pass category with a good or very good interpretation.

show abstract

Catatan Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh: Hasil Belajar Sains Dan Pembelajarannya Pada Mahasiswa Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar

Cited by 3 publications

References 18 publications

Analysis of the Weaknesses of Hybrid Learning During the Pandemic: Case Study in Basic Natural Science (Bns) Lectures

Analysis of the Weaknesses of Hybrid Learning During the Pandemic: Case Study in Basic Natural Science (Bns) Lectures

Analysis of the quality of students science research ideas through the implementation of research-based learning models

Evaluasi Hasil Pembelajaran Sains Melalui Implementasi Studi Independen dan Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Riset (PBR)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About