2010
DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.091421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CATCH: a clinical decision rule for the use of computed tomography in children with minor head injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
216
6
7

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 447 publications
(236 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
7
216
6
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, injuries needing neurosurgical treatment are very uncommon in children with GCS scores of 14-15 [22]. Martin et al [10] found that only 0.6% of children with TBI needed neurosurgical intervention; a similar percentage (1.5%) was found by Guzel and coworkers [15]. In the present study, we found that 4.6% of patients needed neurosurgical intervention.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, injuries needing neurosurgical treatment are very uncommon in children with GCS scores of 14-15 [22]. Martin et al [10] found that only 0.6% of children with TBI needed neurosurgical intervention; a similar percentage (1.5%) was found by Guzel and coworkers [15]. In the present study, we found that 4.6% of patients needed neurosurgical intervention.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Computed tomography (CT) of the head is the gold standard for the diagnosis of complications from TBI. There are different guidelines [3,[5][6][7] available for the management of TBI and variable CT indications, and few of them validated for the pediatric population are about minor head injury [7][8][9][10]. In Italy, few clinical studies about pediatric head trauma have been documented [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Including 10 events per each candidate predictor variable, 17 345 cases of PPCS would be required after screening for acceptable interrater agreement, assuming a dropout rate of 25% for the a priori selected variables. 27 To obtain 345 cases of PPCS, 1380 patients with new concussion had to be enrolled. Factoring a loss to follow-up rate of 23% based on pilot data, 28 the final derivation cohort sample size required was 1792 patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Seven predictors of abnormal CT-scan findings in patients with concussion have been identified: headache, vomiting, age >60 years, intoxication, deficit in short-term memory (persistent anterograde amnesia), physical evidence of any trauma above the clavicle, and seizure. [20][21][22] Although identified in the New Orleans Criteria as indications for head CT scanning, neither seizure nor mild/moderate headache is a significant univariate predictor of intracranial injury. 3 Moreover, a clinical decision rule has been developed for use in a pediatric population: The Canadian Assessment of Tomography for Childhood Head Injury 22 has identified children at high risk who require neurologic intervention who have sustained a head injury within the previous 24 hours and have 1 of the following findings: GCS <15 at 2 hours after the injury, suspected open or depressed skull fracture, history of worsening headache, or irritability on examination.…”
Section: Non-english Abstracts Translated For Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[20][21][22] Although identified in the New Orleans Criteria as indications for head CT scanning, neither seizure nor mild/moderate headache is a significant univariate predictor of intracranial injury. 3 Moreover, a clinical decision rule has been developed for use in a pediatric population: The Canadian Assessment of Tomography for Childhood Head Injury 22 has identified children at high risk who require neurologic intervention who have sustained a head injury within the previous 24 hours and have 1 of the following findings: GCS <15 at 2 hours after the injury, suspected open or depressed skull fracture, history of worsening headache, or irritability on examination. Children at medium risk and have sustained a head injury and have 1 of the following findings: any sign of basal skull fracture; large, boggy hematoma of the scalp; or dangerous mechanism of injury.…”
Section: Non-english Abstracts Translated For Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%