Catching up or falling behind? Promising changes and persistent patterns across cohorts of economics PhDs in German-speaking countries from 1991 to 2008

Abstract

We investigate economics PhDs minted at German, Austrian, and Swiss universities from 1991 to 2008. We find that cohort sizes increased overall, and the share of PhDs who publish in a peerreviewed journal within six years after graduation increased from 18% in 1991 to 46% in 2008. Publishing rates are heterogeneous across departments. Younger cohorts publish slightly more compared to older cohorts, but these publications are not significantly better in terms of quality. Publication productivity is highly skewed within and between departments. A key difference between PhDs of the German-speaking area and North America lies in their patterns of collaboration.

Is the German Academic Profession on Metrification Autopilot? A Study of 25 Years of Publication Outputs

“…This finding strongly questions the merit of passing PhD regulations that force PhD candidates to publish journal articles, especially when the PhD regulations specify that the journal articles have to be single authored, in English and accepted for publication in an indexed journal (Schneijderberg 2018). The paper-based dissertation requirements to publish in S(S)CI-indexed journals and the adherence to journal ranking lists, for example in business, management and economics (Önder and Schweitzer 2017), pushes pre-doctoral academics to embody socio-calculative valuation, evaluation and valorization practices and that only metrified publication outputs "count". Mau (2018, p. 234) describes this symbolic order of the metrical We as follows: "Only those willing to be counted, count as part of the community" (authors' translation).…”

Top graduate programmes in economics: Historical evolution and recent evidence

“…Doctoral students are increasingly encouraged to publish in peer-reviewed international academic journals, traditional career paths have been broadened by the introduction of assistant professorships (Juniorprofessur), and budgets of public universities (the vast majority of universities in the German-speaking area) have been increasing steadily from the 1990s onwards. (Önder & Schweitzer, 2017(Önder & Schweitzer, , p. 1298). 21 Formation of EEA: 'Ryder Cup' Effect?…”

“…To provide balance the other four prizes for young economists are all Europe‐based, one modelled on the Bates Medal, one awarded through the European Economic Association (EEA) and one for French and one for German‐speaking young economists (see later). The inclusion of the latter is simply a reflection of the rising importance of French and German‐speaking economists and doctorate programmes in the last twenty years or more (see for example Önder & Schweitzer, 2017). Their inclusion also partly addresses the disadvantage for many in relation to the top journals (all in English), partly of course explained by the fact that the native language of these economists is not English and partly by the possible bias towards ‘home university’ graduates in what are almost all US‐based journals (see Fourcade, 2015).…”

Predicting early career productivity of PhD economists: Does advisor-match matter?

“…The early-career publication performance of PhD graduates in economics has been subject to some prior investigations. Recent examples include Buchmueller et al (1999) and Conley and Önder (2014) for the US and Canada, Bäker (2015) and Önder and Schweitzer (2017) for German speaking countries, and Hilmer and Hilmer (2007a) and Cardoso et al (2010), who focus on agricultural economists and labor economists, respectively.…”