Catchment-Scale Participatory Mapping Identifies Stakeholder Perceptions of Land and Water Management Conflicts

Abstract

Competing socioecological demands and pressures on land and water resources have the potential to increase land use conflict. Understanding ecosystem service provisioning and trade-offs, competing land uses, and conflict between stakeholder groups in catchments is therefore critical to inform catchment management and the sustainable use of natural resources. We developed a novel stakeholder engagement methodology that incorporates participatory conflict mapping in three catchments with a short questionnaire to identify the perceptions of 43 participants from four key land and water management stakeholder groups: environmental regulators, water industry practitioners, the farm advisor community, and academics. The participatory mapping exercise produced heat maps of perceived conflict and land use competition, providing spatial detail of the complex combination of land use issues faced by catchment managers. Distinct, localised hotspots were identified in areas under pressure from flooding, abstraction, and urbanisation; as well as more dispersed issues of relevance at the landscape scale, such as from farming, forestry, energy production, and tourism. Subsequent regression modelling linked perceived conflict to land cover maps and identified coastal, urban, and grassland areas as the most likely land cover types associated with conflict in the study catchments. Our approach to participatory conflict mapping provides a novel platform for catchment management and can facilitate increased cooperation among different catchment stakeholders. In turn, land and water management conflicts can be recognised and their underlying drivers and likely solutions identified in an effort to better manage competing demands on catchment resources.

Stakeholder Perceptions of Landscape Justice in the Case of Atlantic Salmon Fishing in Northern Finland

“…An examination of the key informants' perceptions of landscape justice provided insights into land and water management issues and revealed the need for participatory management approaches in the case of Atlantic salmon, which should be further developed. This is because participatory management approaches have shown potential across Europe and beyond to foster mutual understanding and increase local knowledge to inform decision making on the sustainable management of river catchments, including Atlantic salmon fishing activities [54,55]. We found that state governance affects the formation of, but is, therefore, also responsible for managing, the social, cultural, and economic risks.…”

Water for Tomorrow: A Living Lab on the Creation of the Science-Policy-Stakeholder Interface

“…This is a significant achievement of the project, as it connects its outcomes with the respective regulatory and institutional frameworks that will determine the future water management of the BD. Efforts that lack this regulatory component (as well as its interaction with the participatory processes) have resulted in limited changes towards a more effective governance for sustainable water management [34,68].…”

Reinforcing the Hydrosocial Cycle to foster water governance and stakeholders’ interdependence in urban agroecosystems: a local test in Benidorm, Spain

“…Over the years, numerous approaches have been conducted to examine factors influencing the attitudes and behavior of stakeholders, drawing on theories from the social sciences, particularly in the management of hydrosocial territories (Ricart et al, 2019a). Widening participants' involvement in research can identify differences in opinion and understanding across communities, capture valuable local expertise, and facilitate knowledge exchange between stakeholders (Stosch et al, 2022). Participatory research approaches can also ensure that management decisions are more inclusive, socially acceptable, and effectively implemented.…”