1982
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Catecholamine synthesis in rabbit carotid body in vitro

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
8

Year Published

1986
1986
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
17
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar biphasic response of catecholamine synthesis to CH (7.5% O 2 for 4 -12 h) was also reported in the adrenal medulla of guinea pigs and rats (110). On the other hand, CH (10% O 2 for 3 h) facilitates DA and NE synthesis in rabbit and rat carotid bodies, an effect seen only with tyrosine but not with DOPA as substrate, suggesting a role for altered TH activity in CH-induced facilitation of catecholamine synthesis (22,23). These studies suggest that CH exerts differential effects on catecholamine synthesis in the central (brain) versus peripheral nervous system (i.e., carotid body).…”
mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…A similar biphasic response of catecholamine synthesis to CH (7.5% O 2 for 4 -12 h) was also reported in the adrenal medulla of guinea pigs and rats (110). On the other hand, CH (10% O 2 for 3 h) facilitates DA and NE synthesis in rabbit and rat carotid bodies, an effect seen only with tyrosine but not with DOPA as substrate, suggesting a role for altered TH activity in CH-induced facilitation of catecholamine synthesis (22,23). These studies suggest that CH exerts differential effects on catecholamine synthesis in the central (brain) versus peripheral nervous system (i.e., carotid body).…”
mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…General procedures for the synthesis experiments have been described in previous publications (15,50). Analytic procedures have been described in detail in Conde et al (11).…”
Section: Animals and Anesthesiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present work we have tested the capacity of a diverse group of oxidant agents to modify CB chemoreceptor cell activity, assessed by their ability to alter the normoxic and hypoxic release of catecholamines (CA), one of the most abundant chemoreceptor cell neurotransmitters. We have chosen the release of CA as an index of chemoreceptor cell activity because a tight correlation between CA release and intensity of stimulation has been well documented (10,33,43). Oxidant agents studied pertained to three different functional groups: 1) p-chloro-mercuri-phenyl-sulfonate (PCMBS) and 6,6Ј-dithiodinicotinic acid (DTNA) are nonpermeating through plasma cell membranes, and therefore their actions would be restricted to the extracellular face of the plasma membrane; 2) GSSG, 2,2Ј-dithiodipyridine (DTDP), and diamide (Dia) are permeating to cell membranes, and therefore they would cause oxidations both extracellularly and intracellularly; and 3) buthionine sulfoximine (BSO, inhibitor of the glutathione synthesis), 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU, inhibitor of glutathione reductase), and 3-aminotriazole (AT, inhibitor of catalase); inhibitors of ROS disposal enzymes would cause primarily (or exclusively) intracellular oxidation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%