1992
DOI: 10.1007/bfb0087509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Categorical models of N-types for pro-crossed complexes and ℑn-prospaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The notion of n-type introduced by Whitehead [26,27] has a clear geometric meaning and can also be established in the context of non compact spaces and proper maps, see Geoghegan [14]. A program for the study of proper n-types was initiated by Hernández and Porter in [19], where some of the Whitehead's results about n-types were generalized to the context of pro-pointed spaces and some applications were given for proper n-types and shape theory. One advantage of our formulation is that the new result gives a category equivalence instead of the category embeddding given in [18].…”
Section: Theorem 1 Suppose That S Is a Set Of Non Negative Integer Numentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The notion of n-type introduced by Whitehead [26,27] has a clear geometric meaning and can also be established in the context of non compact spaces and proper maps, see Geoghegan [14]. A program for the study of proper n-types was initiated by Hernández and Porter in [19], where some of the Whitehead's results about n-types were generalized to the context of pro-pointed spaces and some applications were given for proper n-types and shape theory. One advantage of our formulation is that the new result gives a category equivalence instead of the category embeddding given in [18].…”
Section: Theorem 1 Suppose That S Is a Set Of Non Negative Integer Numentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Remark 2-2. The first notion of' ^-structure' appears in the thesis of the first author for the category of spaces [4] and in the joint paper [6] for the category of crossed complexes. In these cases, we had the same notion of weak n-equivalence, but different notions of n-cofibration and w-fibration were considered.…”
Section: Definition 2-2 a Map F:x-*-y In Ss Is Said To Be A Weak N-ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can change Top by SS in Proposition 25. PROPOSITION [2][3][4][5][6]. (GM4) A trivial n-cofibration has the LLP with respect to all n-fibrations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This article and [9] view n-equivalences and co-n-equivalences from a particular perspective involving model structures. We warn the reader that our definitions are different than those in [11], which also deals with model structures and a notion of n-equivalence. Our approach is analogous to the so-called good truncation of chain complexes, while the approach of [11] is analogous to the so-called brutal truncation (see [20, 1.2.7], for example).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%