UQ eSpace 2020
DOI: 10.14264/uql.2020.641
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Categorical Perception

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Five of the six fish reached the learning criterion within 5–19 sessions (Figure 4a,b, Parker, Wallis, Obergrussberger, & Siebeck, 2020). As F2 never reached criterion (requirement of two consecutive sessions with discrimination accuracy of at least 75%) and showed no signs of improvement, it was excluded from further experimentation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Five of the six fish reached the learning criterion within 5–19 sessions (Figure 4a,b, Parker, Wallis, Obergrussberger, & Siebeck, 2020). As F2 never reached criterion (requirement of two consecutive sessions with discrimination accuracy of at least 75%) and showed no signs of improvement, it was excluded from further experimentation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the first part of this experiment, fish had to discriminate S+ from morphed distractors, four, nine, and fourteen steps from S+ as well as from S− and S+ (bias control; Figure 2; Parker et al, 2020). No significant difference was found between fish in the two groups (two‐factorial mixed ANOVA: F (1,3) = 1.253, p = .34) and no interaction was found between group and morph step (two‐factorial mixed ANOVA: F (4, 12) = 0.5676, p = .69).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%